Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Hold the approach speed
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 21 stages, 20 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,483 m of the approach.
Plan view — the full 1,483 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 390 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, the aircraft landing score of 90.2% indicates a solid performance with room for improvement in specific areas.
Starting with the Approach Phase, it is noted that the descent path was above the glideslope limit and the speed was slightly below target. This suggests that adjustments need to be made to ensure a more accurate descent path and speed control during this phase of the landing process. However, this is a fixable issue with practice and attention to detail.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, it is positive to see that the threshold height was above target and the landing flare was excellent. This indicates good situational awareness and skill in executing the landing flare, which is crucial for a smooth touchdown.
In the Touchdown Phase, the touchdown rate was excellent and the speed was on target, with the touchdown distance inside the touchdown zone. Additionally, the runway touchdown position was only 5.0 meters from the centerline, which is a good achievement. These factors suggest a strong understanding of touchdown techniques and precision in execution.
Lastly, in the Rollout Phase, although the runway alignment was slightly off at 4.1 meters from the centerline, overall, the landing was successful and within acceptable parameters.
Overall, while there are areas for improvement, particularly in the Approach Phase with descent path and speed control, the landing score of 90.2% is commendable. With continued practice and attention to detail, there is great potential to further improve and achieve even higher scores in future landings. Keep up the good work and continue striving for excellence in every phase of the landing process.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values