Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Improve the rollout
Ground control varies with speed, full authority at walking pace, progressively reducing as groundspeed rises. The aircraft becomes twitchy at any speed, every small pedal input swings the nose, which can encourage large-amplitude leg inputs that no real aircraft would accept.
Read more in How to Taxi AnywhereStart to finish · 45 stages, 44 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,821 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,821 m of the 1,838 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 603 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, a landing score of 78.2% indicates that there were some areas for improvement during the aircraft landing. However, there were also some positive aspects to note which should be commendable.
In the Approach Phase, while the descent path was reported to be below the glideslope limit, this is a common issue that can be easily corrected with practice and experience. It is important for pilots to continue to work on maintaining the correct descent path to ensure a smooth and safe landing.
During the Landing Phase, it is encouraging to see that the threshold height and landing flare were executed well. These are crucial elements of a successful landing and it is great to see that these aspects were performed effectively.
The Touchdown Phase had a good touchdown rate, despite the speed being a little above the target. It is important for pilots to strive to maintain the correct landing speed to prevent any potential safety hazards. The touchdown point being 167m beyond the desired zone is an area that can be improved upon with practice and attention to detail.
Additionally, the poor landing heading and runway touchdown position being 13.9m from the centerline are aspects that can be fine-tuned by focusing on precision and accuracy during the landing process.
In the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment being 19.4m from the centerline is another area that can be improved upon by practicing alignment techniques and coordination.
Overall, while there were some areas for improvement during the landing, it is important to recognize the positive aspects such as the good threshold height, landing flare, and touchdown rate. By continuing to work on areas that need improvement, pilots can strive for even better landing scores in the future. Keep up the good work and stay focused on refining skills for a more successful landing experience.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values