Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Smooth the climb
A good takeoff has a defined shape. It also has a defined end. For an airliner that's thrust reduction and acceleration, commonly somewhere around 1,000 to 1,500 ft above the airfield depending on the operator, while for a light aircraft it's established at Vy with the flaps on schedule. Most simmers have no defined end to their takeoff, which is exactly why it never gets judged.
Read more in Improve Your Take-OffsStart to finish · 23 stages, 21 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,845 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,845 m of the 4,265 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 473 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight on the Boeing 787-9 started at LFPG Charles de Gaulle International Airport in Paris, France. The taxi from the parking area to the runway took 6 minutes, covering a distance of 2 nm. The departure was from runway 26R, with a takeoff distance of 2,227 m, representing 62% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 177 knots. During takeoff, the temperature was 5°C with a wind speed of 10 knots coming from 260°, resulting in a crosswind of 1 knot and a headwind of 10 knots.
Upon reaching cruising altitude, the flight covered 92 nm during the climb from 1,391 ft to 31,484 ft in 12 minutes. The enroute level cruise began southwest of Humbert in France, lasting 27 minutes and covering 652 nm. The second climb occurred north-west of Isle of North Uist in Scotland, covering 47 nm and reaching an altitude of 33,520 ft in 2 minutes.
The flight continued cruising to a latitude of 59.3470076 and a longitude of -11.424027, covering 855 nm in 18 minutes. Another climb to an altitude of 36,799 ft took place at a latitude of 62.8136588 and a longitude of -40.4692862, covering 129 nm in 4 minutes. This was followed by a 55-minute enroute level cruise at a latitude of 62.9900644 and a longitude of -45.3699085, covering 2,096 nm.
The descent began 15 miles northeast of CYCT Coronation Airport in Canada, descending from 36,804 ft to 5,401 ft in 18 minutes, covering 122 nm. The landing was on runway 17L at CYYC Calgary International Airport, with a runway length of 4,265 m. The touchdown speed was 150 knots, and the aircraft touched down 475 m from the threshold with a vertical speed indicator reading of -374 ft/m.
Overall, the flight covered a total distance of 4,004 nm in 148 minutes, consuming 53,913 kg of fuel. The landing distance was 1,768 m, equivalent to 41% of the runway length. Taxiing from the runway to the parking area took 2 minutes, covering less than 1 nm.
Great job on achieving a landing score of 94.9%! Let's break it down and look at the different phases of the aircraft landing to identify areas for improvement.
During the Approach Phase, the descent path above the glideslope limit could be improved. Ensuring that the aircraft maintains a proper descent profile is important for a smooth and controlled landing. By carefully monitoring the descent path, pilots can ensure a more accurate approach to the runway.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, it's great to see that the threshold height and landing flare were both good. These elements are essential for a safe touchdown and can contribute to a successful landing. By maintaining a consistent threshold height and executing a proper landing flare, pilots can ensure a smooth transition to the touchdown phase.
In the Touchdown Phase, there are a few areas that could be refined. The touchdown rate was noted as hard, indicating that the landing may have been more abrupt than desired. Additionally, the speed was slightly above target, which could impact the overall landing quality. The touchdown point being 62 meters beyond the touchdown zone suggests that adjustments can be made to improve landing accuracy.
Furthermore, the runway touchdown position being 5.3 meters from the centerline and the rollout phase runway alignment being 5.0 meters from the centerline indicate the need for improved alignment during the landing. Centerline alignment is crucial for a safe and controlled touchdown, so focusing on maintaining proper alignment can lead to more consistent landings.
Overall, while the landing score was high, there are specific areas within each phase that can be refined to enhance overall performance. By focusing on maintaining a proper descent path, improving touchdown technique, and ensuring accurate alignment during the landing phases, pilots can continue to strive for excellence in their landings. Keep up the good work and continue to refine your skills for even smoother landings in the future!
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values