Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Arrival
Apply small, early rudder corrections against a fixed point at the far end of the runway to hold the centreline from touchdown onward.
What happened: The aircraft drifted 5.5 m off the centreline during the landing roll, and by touchdown the offset had grown to 4.5 m. A centreline deviation that appears on landing usually carries through to a larger offset at touchdown.
Watch for: Centreline marker: aircraft tracking straight over the runway centreline, not drifting to either side.
Ground control varies with speed, full authority at walking pace, progressively reducing as groundspeed rises. The aircraft becomes twitchy at any speed, every small pedal input swings the nose, which can encourage large-amplitude leg inputs that no real aircraft would accept.
Read more in How to Taxi AnywhereStart to finish · 17 stages, 15 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway. They are the approach's score: the checks passed out of the checks that ran.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 3,342 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 448 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Departing from Sarajevo International Airport, the Boeing 737-800 began its journey by taxiing from the parking area to the runway, a process that took approximately 4 minutes and covered a distance of 1 nautical mile. As the aircraft lined up on runway 29, the local weather conditions were favorable, with a temperature of 24 °C and a gentle headwind of 2 knots. The takeoff roll commenced, and the aircraft lifted off the ground at a speed of 149 knots, utilizing 39% of the available runway length of 789 meters.
As the aircraft climbed away from Sarajevo, it began its enroute climb, which started approximately 1 mile northwest of the airport. The climb phase was characterized by a steady increase in altitude, from 2,605 feet above sea level to 39,997 feet, a total ascent of 37,392 feet. This phase of the flight took 38 minutes to complete and covered a distance of 270 nautical miles. The aircraft then transitioned into a level cruise, which lasted for 42 minutes and covered a further 312 nautical miles, with the aircraft flying overhead Zagorje, Slovenia. The descent phase began overhead Miecourt, Switzerland, and the aircraft descended from 40,000 feet to 4,034 feet, a decrease of 35,966 feet, in 36 minutes and covering 230 nautical miles. The final approach to Paris-Orly Airport was initiated, with the aircraft descending from 4,002 feet to 1,610 feet in just 2 minutes and covering 10 nautical miles.
The Boeing 737-800 touched down on runway 06 at Paris-Orly Airport, with a touchdown distance of 450 meters, slightly above the target threshold speed of 138 knots. The touchdown speed was 126 knots, and the touchdown rate was smooth at -109 feet per minute. The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned, but the runway rollout alignment was very good. The total landing distance was 949 meters, utilizing 28% of the available runway length. The aircraft then taxied to the parking area, a process that took 3 minutes and covered less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 835 nautical miles, and the aircraft used 5,699 kilograms of fuel during the journey, which took a total of 129 minutes.
The Boeing 737-800 touched down on runway 06 at LFPO Paris-Orly Airport with a smooth touchdown rate of -109 fpm, indicating a well-executed landing. The aircraft's speed at touchdown was 126 kt, which was within the acceptable range. The touchdown distance of 450 m was also satisfactory, demonstrating good control and precision during the final stages of the approach.
The approach quality was good, with a threshold height that met the expected standards. However, the threshold speed was slightly above the target at 138 kt, which may have been due to the aircraft's weight or other factors. The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 5.6 m from the centreline, but this did not significantly impact the overall performance of the landing. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 13 °C and a gentle wind of 6 kt at 10 °, contributed to a stable and predictable approach.
The rollout phase was executed well, with the aircraft maintaining a very good alignment with the centreline. The total landing distance of 949 m, which accounted for 28% of the runway length, was within the acceptable range. Overall, the landing was considered to be of high quality, with a score of 98.8% reflecting the crew's skill and attention to detail.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values