Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Make small rudder corrections against a point at the far end to hold the centreline.
What happened: During the ground roll you drifted 9.8 m off the runway centreline.
Watch for: Watch runway alignment against the centreline, correcting with small rudder inputs.
See Departure Roll
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 26 stages, 24 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
At the 1,000 ft gate: speed below the reference speed.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,990 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,990 m of the 3,589 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 641 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight in question was operated by a Boeing 777F aircraft, departing from Singapore Changi Airport (WSSS) on runway 02C. The taxiing process from the parking area to the runway took approximately 19 minutes and covered a distance of 9 nautical miles. The aircraft took off with a liftoff speed of 198 knots, utilizing 63% of the runway's length, which was 2,519 meters.
During the initial climb, the aircraft ascended from 1,057 feet above sea level to 28,947 feet, an increase of 27,890 feet, in 19 minutes and covering 117 nautical miles. The enroute climb started 1 mile northeast of the departure airport and continued through various points, including Pulau Sebang, Sabang, Alibag, and Umm Qasr, before reaching the final cruise altitude.
The flight consisted of multiple enroute level cruises, each lasting between 51 minutes and 188 minutes, and covering distances ranging from 448 nautical miles to 1,373 nautical miles. The aircraft climbed to higher altitudes at various points, including a 1,929-foot increase in 3 minutes and a 2,200-foot increase in 3 minutes.
The final descent started 1 mile west of Neustadt in Sachsen, Germany, and the aircraft descended from 35,993 feet to 1,652 feet in 21 minutes and covering 81 nautical miles. The final approach was made to runway 08R at Leipzig/Halle Airport (EDDP) from the west, with a heading of 85.0 degrees at 4 nautical miles and 1,201 feet above ground level.
The landing was successful, with a touchdown point 233 meters beyond the touchdown zone. The touchdown speed was 157 knots, which was above the target speed, and the touchdown rate was excellent at -58 feet per minute. The runway touchdown alignment was perfect, and the runway rollout alignment was also perfect.
The total landing distance was 1,917 meters, which was 53% of the runway's length. The taxiing process from the runway to the parking area took 7 minutes and covered less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 5,689 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 742 minutes. The aircraft used 107,827 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The Boeing 777F aircraft successfully landed at EDDP Leipzig/Halle Airport, achieving a high score of 95.2%. The final approach to runway 08R was conducted from the west, with a heading of 85.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,201 feet above ground level (agl).
The aircraft touched down on the runway, with a threshold speed that was well above the target at 157 knots. This indicates a safe and controlled approach, as the aircraft was able to maintain a high speed while still being able to touch down within the designated touchdown zone. However, the touchdown point was 233 meters beyond the touchdown zone, which may indicate a slight deviation from the intended landing spot.
The touchdown speed of 157 knots was considered good, and the touchdown rate of -58 feet per minute (fpm) was excellent. This suggests that the aircraft was able to touch down smoothly and maintain control throughout the landing process. The runway touchdown alignment was also perfect, indicating that the aircraft was properly aligned with the runway during the landing.
The local weather conditions at the time of the landing were favorable, with a temperature of 22°C and a wind speed of 11 knots at 89°. The crosswind component was minimal at 1 knot, while the headwind component was 11 knots, which helped to reduce the landing distance.
The total landing distance was 1,917 meters, which is 53% of the runway length. This is a relatively short landing distance, indicating that the aircraft was able to touch down and come to a stop quickly and efficiently. The runway rollout alignment was also perfect, indicating that the aircraft was able to maintain control and alignment during the rollout phase of the landing.
Overall, the landing was considered successful, with a high score and excellent performance in terms of touchdown speed, touchdown rate, and runway alignment.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values