Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Use smooth aileron to roll the wings level in the first climb segment, holding bank angle near wings-level instead of letting it build to 4°.
What happened: The wings held 4° of bank through the first climb segment and had drifted to 3.3° by the second - this early wing-level drift usually carries through into a larger bank excursion later in the climb.
Watch for: Watch the attitude indicator's bank pointer and keep it at wings level throughout the climb.
Arrival
Ease the descent rate on final, flying a shallower path back onto the target glidepath angle rather than diving steep.
What happened: On final, the approach was flown at a steeper angle than the target glidepath for that segment.
Watch for: Watch the VSI and glidepath/VASI indication on final, keeping the descent angle matched to the target rather than steepening.
See Arrival Final 1
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 24 stages, 22 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
At the 1,000 ft gate: off the centreline.
At the 500 ft gate: sink rate above what the glideslope needed and off the centreline.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 3,567 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 404 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took 9 minutes and covered a distance of 2 nautical miles. The aircraft, an ATR 72, then departed from runway 25 at LRBS Bucharest Băneasa Aurel Vlaicu International Airport. The takeoff distance was 1,131 meters, which is 38% of the runway length. The liftoff speed was 128 knots.
The local weather conditions at the time of departure were a temperature of 15°C, with a wind speed of 4 knots at 300°. The crosswind was 3 knots, and the headwind was also 3 knots. The aircraft began its enroute climb 1 mile east of Sector 1, Bucuresti, Romania, and climbed from 1,302 feet above sea level to 16,862 feet above sea level, an increase of 15,561 feet in 15 minutes, covering a distance of 49 nautical miles.
The enroute level cruise started 2 miles southwest of Maracineni, Buzau, Romania, and lasted 12 minutes, covering a distance of 59 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its descent 2 miles southwest of Certesti, Galati, Romania, and descended from 16,944 feet above sea level to 15,512 feet above sea level, a decrease of 1,431 feet in 2 minutes, covering a distance of 7 nautical miles.
The enroute level cruise started again 2 miles west of Balasesti, Galati, Romania, and lasted 2 minutes, covering a distance of 1 nautical mile. The aircraft then began its descent 2 miles east of Tutova, Vaslui, Romania, and descended from 15,274 feet above sea level to 11,732 feet above sea level, a decrease of 3,542 feet in 5 minutes, covering a distance of 24 nautical miles.
The enroute level cruise started once more 3 miles south of Vutcani, Vaslui, Romania, and lasted 20 minutes, covering a distance of less than 1 nautical mile. The aircraft then began its descent 3 miles south of Vutcani, Vaslui, Romania, and descended from 11,732 feet above sea level to 6,307 feet above sea level, a decrease of 5,425 feet in 9 minutes, covering a distance of 35 nautical miles.
The enroute level cruise started again 1 mile northwest of Hincesti, Hincesti, Moldova, and lasted 5 minutes, covering a distance of 1 nautical mile. The aircraft then began its descent 2 miles northwest of Hincesti, Hincesti, Moldova, and descended from 5,663 feet above sea level to 1,662 feet above sea level, a decrease of 4,001 feet in 4 minutes, covering a distance of 11 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 08 at LUKK Chişinău International Airport was made from the west, heading 86.0° at 4 nautical miles and 1,316 feet above ground level. The landing on runway 08 was successful, with a touchdown distance of 405 meters, which is good. The touchdown speed was 105 knots, and the touchdown rate was firm at -332 feet per minute.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were a temperature of 12°C, with a wind speed of 6 knots at 69°. The crosswind was 2 knots, and the headwind was 6 knots. The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 3.8 meters from the centerline. The total landing distance was 771 meters, which is 22% of the runway length. The
The ATR 72 aircraft successfully landed at LUKK Chişinău International Airport, achieving an overall score of 81.3%. The final approach to runway 08 was initiated from the west, with a heading of 86.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,316 feet above ground level (agl). The aircraft successfully touched down on the runway, which has a length of 3,567 meters.
The threshold height was reported as good, and the threshold speed was slightly above the target at 115 knots. The touchdown distance was also good, measuring 405 meters. The touchdown speed of 105 knots was within the acceptable range, and the touchdown rate was firm at -332 feet per minute (fpm). However, the runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned from the centreline by 3.8 meters.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 12°C, with a wind speed of 6 knots at a direction of 69°. The crosswind component was minimal at 2 knots, while the headwind component was 6 knots. The total landing distance was 771 meters, which accounted for 22% of the runway length.
Despite the slight misalignment of the touchdown position, the runway rollout alignment was reported as very good. Overall, the landing was considered successful, with the aircraft demonstrating good control and stability throughout the approach and touchdown phases.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values