Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 21 stages, 19 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,765 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,765 m of the 2,980 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 557 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, the aircraft landing score of 96.4% indicates a very successful landing with high proficiency in most areas.
During the Approach Phase, the excellent glideslope alignment suggests that the pilot was able to maintain vertical guidance accurately throughout the descent, ensuring a smooth and stable approach to the runway. This demonstrates strong piloting skills and attentiveness to detail.
Moving onto the Landing Phase, the good threshold height and landing flare indicate that the aircraft was properly aligned with the runway and at the correct altitude for a safe touchdown. This shows good judgment and precision on the part of the pilot.
In the Touchdown Phase, while the touchdown rate was hard, the speed was on target, which suggests that the pilot was able to control the aircraft effectively and maintain proper airspeed during the landing. The touchdown point being 142 m beyond the touchdown zone may indicate a slight overshoot, but the runway touchdown position only 4.3 m from the centerline shows good lateral control.
Lastly, during the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment being 5.1 m from the centerline may suggest some room for improvement in maintaining lateral positioning, but overall, the landing appears to have been successful with minor deviations.
In conclusion, while there are a few areas that could be improved upon, the overall landing score of 96.4% is a testament to the skill and proficiency of the pilot. Encouragement to continue practicing and fine-tuning techniques can help achieve even higher scores in the future. Keep up the good work!
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values