Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Rotate sooner, bringing the nose up at 125 kt rather than letting speed build further.
What happened: You lifted off at 148 kt against a rotation target of 125 kt, rotating late in the ground roll.
Watch for: Watch airspeed and rotate at the target of 125 kt.
See Departure Roll
Arrival
Begin raising the nose earlier, by 11 ft, so the flare has time to arrest the sink before touchdown.
What happened: The flare began late at 0.4 ft, 11 ft below the normal band, and a late flare like this usually leaves too little time to arrest the sink before touchdown.
Watch for: Watch radio altitude and start the flare in the normal band, around 11 ft.
A typical trainer rotates in the mid-50s of knots - a 172 at around 55 KIAS, climbing out at a Vy in the low 70s, though check your own POH rather than memorising Cessna's numbers - and the transferable rule is that Vr sits just above the stall speed in takeoff configuration. Rotate early because "it felt ready" and the aircraft lifts off inside ground effect, where induced drag is reduced, then climbs out of it into more drag. On a marginal-performance day the result is an aircraft that lifts off and then refuses to climb, sagging back towards the runway.
Read more in Improve Your Take-OffsStart to finish · 18 stages, 16 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with six checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
At the 1,000 ft gate: gear still up and speed above the reference speed.
At the 500 ft gate: speed above the reference speed.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 5,000 ft of the approach.
Plan view — the first 5,000 ft of the 11,537 ft runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 613 ft touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with taxiing from the parking area to the runway at KSBA Santa Barbara Municipal Airport, taking approximately 6 minutes and covering less than 1 nautical mile. The aircraft then departed from runway 25, with a takeoff distance of 2,496 feet, which is 41% of the runway length. The liftoff speed was 148 knots.
The local weather conditions at the time of departure were characterized by a temperature of 75°F and a wind speed of 9 knots from 240°. This resulted in a crosswind of 4 knots and a headwind of 8 knots. The aircraft began its enroute climb approximately 1 mile northwest of Isla Vista, California, and ascended from an altitude of 1,041 feet above sea level to 36,415 feet above sea level, an increase of 35,374 feet, in 12 minutes and covering 59 nautical miles.
The enroute level cruise started 2 miles southeast of Avila Beach, California, and lasted for 5 minutes, covering 41 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its enroute descent approximately 6 miles northeast of the CN66 Hearst San Simeon Airstrip in San Simeon, California. The descent from 37,185 feet above sea level to 1,305 feet above sea level, a decrease of 35,880 feet, took 21 minutes and covered 122 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 28R at KSFO San Francisco International Airport was made from the southeast, heading 298.0° at 4 nautical miles and 1,262 feet above ground level. The landing on runway 28R was successful, with a touchdown distance of 614 feet, which is 16% of the runway length. The threshold speed was slightly below the target at 111 knots, and the touchdown speed was a little fast at 110 knots. The touchdown rate was very hard at -543 feet per minute.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 68°F and a wind speed of 20 knots from 280°. This resulted in a crosswind of 6 knots and a headwind of 19 knots. The runway touchdown position was misaligned by 26 feet from the centreline, and the runway rollout alignment was slightly misaligned by 25 feet from the centreline.
The taxiing from the runway to the parking area took approximately 12 minutes and covered less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 229 nautical miles, taking 55 minutes, and the aircraft used 1,536 pounds of fuel.
Aircraft C750 successfully landed at San Francisco International Airport (KSFO) on runway 28R, achieving a score of 94.0%. The aircraft approached the runway from the southeast, heading 298.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,262 feet above ground level (agl).
The landing was executed with a good threshold height, indicating that the aircraft was properly configured for landing. However, the threshold speed was slightly below the target speed of 111 knots, which may have been due to the aircraft's descent rate or the pilot's decision to flare earlier than expected. The touchdown distance of 614 feet was within acceptable limits, but the touchdown speed of 110 knots was a little fast, which may have contributed to the hard touchdown rate.
The touchdown rate of -543 feet per minute (fpm) was very hard, indicating that the aircraft may have touched down with a significant amount of energy. This could be due to the pilot's decision to flare too late or not enough, or the aircraft's descent rate being too steep. The runway touchdown position was misaligned by 26 feet from the centreline, which may have been due to the pilot's failure to properly align the aircraft with the runway or a crosswind component.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 68°F and a wind speed of 20 knots from 280°. The crosswind component was 6 knots, while the headwind component was 19 knots. These conditions may have contributed to the aircraft's misalignment with the runway centreline.
The total landing distance of 1,846 feet was 16% of the runway length, which is within acceptable limits. However, the runway rollout alignment was slightly misaligned by 25 feet from the centreline, indicating that the pilot may have failed to properly align the aircraft with the runway during the rollout phase.
Overall, while the landing was successful, there were some areas for improvement, including the hard touchdown rate and the misalignment of the aircraft with the runway centreline.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values