Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 31 stages, 29 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 3,595 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 701 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, despite the aircraft landing score of 93.0%, there were some areas that could use improvement.
During the Approach Phase, the descent path was above the glideslope limit and the speed was slightly below target. It is important to ensure that the descent path is followed accurately and that the speed is maintained at the required level to ensure a smooth landing.
In the Landing Phase, the threshold height was above the target and there was a poor landing flare. Improving the threshold height and perfecting the landing flare technique can help in achieving a more precise and controlled touchdown.
During the Touchdown Phase, the touchdown rate was excellent and the speed was on target, which shows a good level of control during this critical phase of the landing process. However, the touchdown point being 275 m beyond the touchdown zone indicates the need for better judgment and alignment during landing.
The Runway Touchdown Position being 3.9 m from the centerline and Rollout Phase runway alignment being 4.7 m from the centerline both suggest the need for better alignment and positional awareness while landing.
Despite these areas for improvement, achieving a landing score of 93.0% is commendable and shows skill and proficiency in aircraft handling. By focusing on improving the descent path, speed control, threshold height, landing flare, touchdown point, and runway alignment, you can strive towards even better landing scores in the future. Keep practicing and refining your techniques, and you will see continuous improvement in your landings. Keep up the good work!
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values