Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
See Arrival Landing
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 19 stages, 17 in the score
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,894 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 541 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Departing from Amsterdam Airport Schiphol, the Boeing 737-600 began its journey by taxiing from the parking area to the runway, a process that took 6 minutes and covered a distance of 2 nautical miles. As it reached the runway, the aircraft started its departure roll on runway 36C, accelerating to a liftoff speed of 140 knots. The takeoff distance of 603 meters, which accounted for 21% of the runway, was achieved in a relatively short period.
As the aircraft climbed to its cruising altitude, it began its enroute climb 1 mile south of Lijnden, Netherlands, and continued to ascend to 38,546 feet above sea level, a total increase of 37,596 feet in 41 minutes, covering a distance of 342 nautical miles. The enroute level cruise phase started 3 miles northeast of Liseleje, Denmark, and lasted for 40 minutes, covering 335 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its enroute descent 54 miles northwest of Mustjala, Estonia, and descended from 39,000 feet to 2,174 feet above sea level, a decrease of 36,826 feet in 20 minutes, covering 143 nautical miles. The final approach to runway 15 at Helsinki Vantaa Airport was initiated from the northwest, with the aircraft maintaining a heading of 148.0 degrees at 3 nautical miles and 1,194 feet above ground level.
The Boeing 737-600 landed on runway 15 at Helsinki Vantaa Airport, with a total landing distance of 1,010 meters, accounting for 35% of the runway. The touchdown point was 116 meters beyond the touchdown zone, and the touchdown speed of 120 knots was slightly above the target. The touchdown rate was smooth at -145 feet per minute, and the runway touchdown alignment was perfect. Following the landing, the aircraft taxied to the parking area, a process that took 1 minute and covered less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 836 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 112 minutes, with a fuel consumption of 5,078 kilograms.
The Boeing 737-600 touched down on runway 15 at EFHK Helsinki Vantaa Airport with a score of 99.0%. The aircraft approached the runway from the north west, heading 148.0° at 3 nautical miles and 1,194 feet above ground level. The final approach was characterized by good threshold height, allowing the crew to maintain a stable and controlled descent. However, the threshold speed was slightly above the target at 130 knots, indicating a slight deviation from the optimal landing speed.
The aircraft touched down 116 meters beyond the touchdown zone, with a touchdown speed of 120 knots, which was a little fast. Nevertheless, the touchdown rate was smooth at -145 feet per minute, indicating a well-controlled descent. The runway touchdown alignment was perfect, with the aircraft centered on the runway. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 7°C and a headwind of 4 knots at 150°, contributed to a stable and predictable approach.
The total landing distance was 1,010 meters, which accounted for 35% of the runway length. The runway rollout alignment was perfect, with the aircraft maintaining its centerline alignment throughout the rollout phase. Overall, the landing was characterized by good approach quality, smooth touchdown characteristics, and perfect runway alignment, resulting in a high score of 99.0%.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values