Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Maintain the centreline
A small uncorrected heading error at 40 knots becomes a metre of offset per second by 100 knots, noticed only at rotation, producing a crabbed liftoff. Root cause is nearly always eyes on the tape instead of the far end of the runway. Small heading changes displace a distant point visibly long before the nearby centreline stripes look wrong.
Read more in Improve Your Take-OffsStart to finish · 19 stages, 18 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 3,054 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 518 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Great job on achieving a high landing score of 94.1% overall! Let's break down each phase of the landing and see where improvements can be made.
In the Approach Phase, it seems like there was an issue with the descent path being above the glideslope limit. This indicates that adjustments could be made to ensure a smoother and more accurate descent towards the runway. Perhaps paying closer attention to altitude control and making small corrections as needed can help improve this aspect of the landing.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, it's noted that the threshold height was above target and the landing flare was poor. This suggests that a more precise approach and flare technique could be worked on, focusing on hitting the target threshold height and executing a smoother flare to ensure a softer touchdown.
During the Touchdown Phase, it's great to see that the touchdown rate was good and the speed was on target. However, the touchdown point being 80 meters beyond the touchdown zone could indicate a need for better judgment and planning in terms of aiming for the correct touchdown point. Additionally, the runway touchdown position being very good shows consistency and skill in executing the landing.
Lastly, in the Rollout Phase, it's commendable that the runway alignment was very good. This indicates good control and accuracy in maintaining alignment with the runway centerline during the rollout.
Overall, this detailed analysis provides valuable insights into the strengths and areas for improvement in each phase of the landing. By focusing on refining techniques such as descent path control, flare execution, and touchdown point accuracy, you can continue to hone your skills and strive for even higher landing scores. Keep up the great work and stay committed to continuous improvement in your landings!
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values