Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 20 stages, 18 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Two stabilised approach gates, each with six checks at 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 3,189 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 690 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with the aircraft taxiing from the parking area to the runway at LOWW Vienna International Airport, taking 11 minutes and covering a distance of 4 nautical miles. The departure roll took place on runway 34, with a takeoff distance of 1,191 meters, which was 33% of the runway length. The aircraft lifted off at a speed of 142 knots.
As the aircraft climbed out of Vienna, it encountered local weather conditions of 2°C temperature and winds of 14 knots at 198 degrees. The crosswind was 8 knots, while the tailwind was 11 knots. The enroute climb started overhead the airport, with the aircraft ascending from 1,669 feet above sea level to 9,268 feet above sea level, an increase of 7,599 feet in just 4 minutes, covering a distance of 18 nautical miles.
The enroute level cruise began 2 miles north of Wolkersdorf im Weinviertel, lasting 2 minutes and covering 8 nautical miles. However, the aircraft soon began another climb, this time from 9,278 feet above sea level to 35,887 feet above sea level, an increase of 26,609 feet in 16 minutes, covering a distance of 81 nautical miles. The enroute level cruise resumed 3 miles south of Zimutice, lasting 26 minutes and covering 160 nautical miles.
As the aircraft approached its destination, it began its descent from 35,563 feet above sea level to 1,432 feet above sea level, a decrease of 34,131 feet in 30 minutes, covering a distance of 116 nautical miles. The final approach to runway 27R at EDDV Hannover Airport was made from the east, with the aircraft heading 273.0 degrees at 4 nautical miles and 1,248 feet above ground level.
The landing took place on runway 27R, which was 3,189 meters long. The threshold height was good, but the threshold speed was slightly above the target at 138 knots. The touchdown point was 265 meters beyond the touchdown zone, with a touchdown speed of 128 knots and a touchdown rate of -185 feet per minute, both of which were good. However, the runway touchdown position was misaligned by 11.1 meters from the centerline, and the runway rollout alignment was misaligned by 16.6 meters from the centerline.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were 2°C temperature and winds of 25 knots at 250 degrees, with a crosswind of 10 knots and a headwind of 23 knots. The total landing distance was 1,210 meters, which was 38% of the runway length. After landing, the aircraft taxied to the parking area, taking 4 minutes and covering a distance of 1 nautical mile.
The total flight distance was 393 nautical miles, taking 95 minutes, and the aircraft used 2,604 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The aircraft in question, an E195, successfully landed at EDDV Hannover Airport, achieving an impressive score of 85.4%. The final approach to runway 27R was initiated from the east, with the aircraft heading 273.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,248 feet above ground level.
Upon landing, the aircraft touched down on the runway, with the threshold speed being slightly above the target at 138 knots. The touchdown point was located 265 meters beyond the designated touchdown zone, which is a relatively minor deviation. The touchdown speed of 128 knots was within the acceptable range, and the touchdown rate of -185 feet per minute was also satisfactory.
However, there were some minor issues with the alignment of the aircraft during the landing. The runway touchdown position was misaligned by 11.1 meters from the centerline, and the runway rollout alignment was also off by 16.6 meters from the centerline. These deviations are relatively minor and do not appear to have had a significant impact on the overall safety of the landing.
The local weather conditions at the time of the landing were characterized by a temperature of 2°C and a wind speed of 25 knots from a direction of 250°. This resulted in a crosswind of 10 knots and a headwind of 23 knots, which may have contributed to the slight deviations in alignment during the landing.
Overall, the landing was considered successful, with the aircraft coming to a stop within 38% of the runway length, covering a total distance of 1,210 meters. While there were some minor issues with alignment, the pilot's skills and the aircraft's performance were able to compensate for these deviations, resulting in a safe and successful landing.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values