Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Make small rudder corrections against a point at the far end to hold the centreline.
What happened: During the ground roll you drifted 7.4 m off the runway centreline.
Watch for: Watch runway alignment against the centreline, correcting with small rudder inputs.
See Departure Roll
Arrival
Fly the flare as one continuous check of the sink rate from 25 ft, holding back pressure steadily rather than adjusting pitch piecemeal.
What happened: The flare drifted away from its intended profile rather than tracking it smoothly from 25 ft down to touchdown.
Watch for: Watch radio altitude and VSI through the flare, aiming to arrest the sink smoothly from 25 ft to touchdown.
See Arrival Landing
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 23 stages, 21 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
At the 1,000 ft gate: speed below the reference speed.
At the 500 ft gate: speed below the reference speed.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,967 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,967 m of the 4,001 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 1,123 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with taxiing from the parking to the runway at LTFJ Istanbul Sabiha Gökçen International Airport, which took 18 minutes and covered a distance of 4 nautical miles. The aircraft then departed from runway 06L, with a takeoff distance of 1,400 meters, which is 47% of the runway length. The liftoff speed was 145 knots.
As the aircraft climbed to a higher altitude, it encountered local weather conditions of 15°C temperature and winds of 7 knots at 40°. The crosswind was 3 knots, and the headwind was 6 knots. The enroute climb started 1 mile northeast of LTFJ Istanbul Sabiha Gökçen International Airport Pendik, and the aircraft climbed from 1,264 feet above sea level to 36,999 feet above sea level, an increase of 35,734 feet in 19 minutes, covering a distance of 240 nautical miles.
After reaching the desired altitude, the aircraft entered a level cruise, which started 12 miles southwest of Iskilip, Corum, Turkey. This phase of the flight lasted 32 minutes and covered a distance of 594 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its descent, which started 7 miles north of Mingelchaur, Mingacevir City, Azerbaijan. The descent from 37,000 feet above sea level to 14,248 feet above sea level, a decrease of 22,752 feet, took 9 minutes and covered a distance of 98 nautical miles.
The aircraft then entered another level cruise, which started 9 miles southwest of Kilyazi, Khizi Rayon, Azerbaijan, and lasted 5 minutes, covering a distance of 30 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its descent again, which started 2 miles east of Corat, Sumqayit City, Azerbaijan. The descent from 14,000 feet above sea level to 7,004 feet above sea level, a decrease of 6,996 feet, took 6 minutes and covered a distance of 33 nautical miles.
The aircraft then entered another level cruise, which started 16 miles southeast of Puta, Baku City, Azerbaijan, and lasted 5 minutes, covering a distance of 21 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its descent once more, which started 18 miles south of Zyrya, Baku City, Azerbaijan. The descent from 7,008 feet above sea level to 2,006 feet above sea level, a decrease of 5,001 feet, took 5 minutes and covered a distance of 18 nautical miles.
The aircraft then entered another level cruise, which started 4 miles south of Hovsan, Baku City, Azerbaijan, and lasted 2 minutes, covering a distance of 6 nautical miles. The final approach to runway 34 at UBBB Heydar Aliyev International Airport was made from the south, heading 346.0° at 4 nautical miles and 1,291 feet above ground level.
The landing on runway 34 was successful, with a touchdown point 703 meters beyond the touchdown zone. The touchdown speed was 121 knots, which was good, and the touchdown rate was excellent at -93 feet per minute. However, the runway touchdown position was misaligned by 10.1 meters from the centerline. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were 8°C temperature and winds of 6 knots at 40°, with a crosswind of 5 knots and a headwind of 4 knots.
The total landing distance was 1,882 meters, which is 47% of the runway length. The runway rollout alignment was slightly misaligned by 10.1 meters from the centerline. Taxiing to the parking from the runway took 7 minutes and covered less than
The Airbus A32NX aircraft successfully landed at UBBB Heydar Aliyev International Airport, achieving a score of 86.1%. The final approach to runway 34 was initiated from the south, with a heading of 346.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,291 feet above ground level (agl). The aircraft successfully touched down on the runway, with a threshold speed of 135 knots being maintained.
The touchdown point was located 703 meters beyond the designated touchdown zone, which is a relatively long distance. However, the touchdown speed of 121 knots was within the acceptable range, and the touchdown rate of -93 feet per minute (fpm) was excellent, indicating a smooth and controlled descent. Despite the successful touchdown, the runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned from the centerline by 10.1 meters.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 8°C and a wind speed of 6 knots from a direction of 40°. The crosswind component was 5 knots, while the headwind component was 4 knots. These conditions did not appear to significantly impact the landing, as the aircraft was able to maintain control and touch down safely.
The total landing distance of 1,882 meters was 47% of the available runway length, which is a relatively short distance. However, the runway rollout alignment was also slightly misaligned from the centerline by 10.1 meters, which may have contributed to the slightly longer than ideal landing distance. Overall, the landing was successful, but there is room for improvement in terms of alignment and touchdown point accuracy.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values