Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Improve the rollout
Ground control varies with speed, full authority at walking pace, progressively reducing as groundspeed rises. The aircraft becomes twitchy at any speed, every small pedal input swings the nose, which can encourage large-amplitude leg inputs that no real aircraft would accept.
Read more in How to Taxi AnywhereStart to finish · 15 stages, 13 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway. They are the approach's score: the checks passed out of the checks that ran.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,537 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,537 m of the 3,047 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 422 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Departing from KLAS Harry Reid International Airport in Las Vegas, Nevada, the Boeing 737-800 began its journey with a taxiing period of 7 minutes, covering 2 nautical miles to reach the runway. The departure roll commenced on runway 26R, with the aircraft lifting off at a speed of 158 knots after a takeoff distance of 1,328 meters, which accounted for 40% of the runway. The local weather conditions at the time of departure featured a temperature of 20°C, with a wind speed of 18 knots at 310°, resulting in a crosswind of 11 knots and a headwind of 14 knots.
As the aircraft climbed out of Las Vegas, it began its enroute climb, reaching an altitude of 34,446 feet above sea level in 19 minutes, covering a distance of 124 nautical miles. The climb started overhead the airport, with the aircraft increasing its altitude by 31,242 feet. Following the climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase, lasting 80 minutes and covering 687 nautical miles, with the aircraft flying at a steady altitude of 34,446 feet. The cruise phase concluded 21 miles northeast of the Hualapai Airport in Peach Springs, Arizona. The aircraft then began its enroute descent, reducing its altitude from 35,464 feet to 1,814 feet in 26 minutes, covering a distance of 153 nautical miles. The descent phase started 9 miles north of the Trust Landing Airport in Chester, Oklahoma.
The final approach to runway 18L at KTUL Tulsa International Airport was initiated from the north, with the aircraft flying at a heading of 183.0° at 4 nautical miles and 1,183 feet above ground level. The landing was executed on a runway length of 3,052 meters, with a threshold speed slightly above the target at 144 knots. The touchdown distance was good at 425 meters, but the touchdown speed of 134 knots was a little fast, resulting in a fair touchdown rate of -234 feet per minute. The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 7.5 meters from the centerline. Following the landing, the aircraft taxied to the parking area in 2 minutes, covering less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 973 nautical miles, with a total flight time of 137 minutes and a fuel consumption of 5,657 kilograms.
The Boeing 737-800 touched down on runway 18L at KTUL Tulsa International Airport with a good threshold height, allowing the crew to maintain a stable approach profile. However, the threshold speed was slightly above the target at 144 kt, indicating a slight deviation from the ideal approach speed. Despite this, the touchdown distance of 425 m was within acceptable limits, demonstrating the crew's ability to manage the aircraft's descent.
Upon touchdown, the aircraft's speed was a little fast at 134 kt, resulting in a fair touchdown rate of -234 fpm. The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 7.5 m from the centreline, which may have been due to the crosswind component of 2 kt. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 24 °C and a headwind of 28 kt, likely contributed to the slight deviations from the ideal approach and touchdown characteristics.
The total landing distance of 1,451 m, which accounted for 48% of the runway length, was within acceptable limits. The runway rollout alignment was very good, indicating that the crew maintained control of the aircraft during the critical phase of the landing. Overall, the landing was scored 97.0%, reflecting the crew's ability to manage the aircraft's approach and touchdown, despite some minor deviations from the ideal performance.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values