Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Make small rudder corrections against a point at the far end to hold the centreline.
What happened: During the ground roll you drifted 4.8 m off the runway centreline.
Watch for: Watch runway alignment against the centreline, correcting with small rudder inputs.
See Departure Roll
Arrival
Reduce power earlier on final to bleed speed back to 127 kt before crossing the threshold.
What happened: You crossed the threshold at 125 kt, 2 kt above the 127 kt target.
Watch for: Airspeed, targeting 127 kt at the threshold.
See Arrival Landing
There are several things that can go wrong during the flare, carrying too much speed over the threshold, starting the flare at the wrong height and inconsistent flight control inputs, all contribute to a poor flare resulting in a hard touchdown or a float down the runway.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 17 stages, 15 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: seven checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out. These checks are the approach's score.
At the 500 ft gate: centreline 2.3° off, against a 1° limit.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,102 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 81 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Departing from UCFL Issyk-Kul, the Boeing 737-600 began its journey with a taxiing period of 3 minutes, covering less than 1 nautical mile to reach the runway. The aircraft then took off from runway 07, utilizing 2,201 meters, or 58% of the runway, to achieve liftoff at a speed of 131 knots. The local weather conditions at the time of departure were characterized by a temperature of 25°C, with a wind speed of 1 knot from 240°, resulting in a negligible crosswind and a slight tailwind.
As the aircraft climbed to cruising altitude, it began its enroute climb from 6,363 feet above sea level to 38,981 feet, an increase of 32,618 feet in 14 minutes, covering a distance of 92 nautical miles. The enroute level cruise phase followed, lasting 136 minutes and spanning 997 nautical miles, before the aircraft initiated its descent from 38,935 feet to 7,929 feet in 21 minutes, covering 142 nautical miles. The final approach to runway 15 at VQPR Paro International Airport was conducted from the northwest, with the aircraft touching down at a speed of 125 knots and a distance of 89 meters, which was slightly above the optimal threshold.
The landing performance was further evaluated, with the aircraft's touchdown speed and rate being slightly above the desired values. However, the runway touchdown position was misaligned by 10.8 meters from the centerline, and the runway rollout alignment was also slightly misaligned by 10.1 meters. The total landing distance was 792 meters, or 40% of the runway length. Following the landing, the aircraft taxied to the parking area in less than 1 minute, covering less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 1,245 nautical miles, with a total flight time of 180 minutes and a fuel consumption of 6,295 kilograms.
The final approach to runway 15 at VQPR Paro International Airport from the north west was initiated at 0 nm and 508 ft above ground level, heading 155.0°. The approach quality was satisfactory, with a good threshold height achieved. However, the threshold speed was initially too high at 157 kt, exceeding the target. The aircraft touched down on the runway, with a touchdown distance of 89 m, which was within acceptable limits. The touchdown speed of 125 kt was a little fast, and the touchdown rate was heavy at -626 fpm.
Upon touchdown, the aircraft's runway touchdown position was found to be misaligned by 10.8 m from the centreline. The local weather conditions were favorable, with a temperature of 13 °C, wind speed of 2 kt at 0°, and a negligible crosswind component of 1 kt. The tailwind component of 2 kt was also minimal. The total landing distance of 792 m was 40% of the runway length, indicating a relatively short landing roll. However, the runway rollout alignment was slightly misaligned by 10.1 m from the centreline.
The overall performance of the landing was evaluated to be 71.6%, indicating a satisfactory but not exceptional landing. The initial threshold speed and touchdown rate were areas for improvement, while the touchdown distance and runway rollout alignment were satisfactory. The favorable weather conditions contributed to a relatively short landing roll, but the slight misalignment of the runway touchdown position and rollout alignment detracted from the overall score.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values