Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 24 stages, 22 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 3,292 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 717 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, the aircraft landing score of 85.2% indicates a fairly successful landing, but there are definitely areas for improvement. Let's break down the different phases of the landing and provide some analysis and encouragement.
Starting with the Approach Phase, it's great to see that the glideslope alignment was good. This means that the aircraft was on the correct descent path towards the runway, which is essential for a safe and successful landing. Keep up the good work on maintaining that glideslope alignment!
Moving on to the Landing Phase, it's important to note that the threshold height was above target. This suggests that the aircraft was higher than desired when crossing the runway threshold, which could have contributed to the poor landing flare. Remember to aim for the correct threshold height to set yourself up for a smoother touchdown next time. Work on improving your landing flare technique to ensure a more controlled and gentle touchdown.
In the Touchdown Phase, it's commendable to see that the touchdown rate was excellent. This indicates that the aircraft made a successful and timely contact with the runway. However, the speed was a little above target, so focus on managing your speed more effectively during the approach and landing phases. Additionally, the touchdown point being 379 m beyond the touchdown zone indicates that there may have been some overshooting during the landing. Try to aim for a touchdown within the designated zone to improve your precision.
Lastly, the runway touchdown position being 12.6 m from the centerline suggests that there was some deviation from the intended landing path. Work on maintaining alignment with the runway centerline to improve your overall landing accuracy.
Overall, you are on the right track with an 85.2% landing score, but there are clear areas for improvement. Keep practicing and refining your landing technique, focusing on maintaining the correct thresholds, managing speed effectively, and improving alignment with the runway centerline. With dedication and persistence, you can continue to improve and achieve even higher scores in future landings. Keep up the good work, and happy flying!
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values