Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Improve the takeoff
The rudder input is a changing profile through the roll rather than one that is held. So the demand on your right foot starts large at power application, eases as speed builds and the rudder gains authority, then jumps again at rotation.
Read more in Improve Your Take-OffsStart to finish · 20 stages, 18 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 3,594 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 360 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with the aircraft taxiing from the parking area to the runway, a process that took 14 minutes and covered a distance of 3 nautical miles. The Airbus A320 then departed from runway 28 at ENDU Bardufoss Airport, with a takeoff distance of 1,248 meters, which accounted for 52% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 163 knots.
The local weather conditions at the time of departure were characterized by a temperature of 1 °C, with a wind speed of 9 knots blowing from a direction of 280°. This resulted in a crosswind of 1 knot and a headwind of 9 knots. The aircraft then began its enroute climb, starting overhead Andselv in Troms og Finnmark, Norway. During this phase, the aircraft climbed from an altitude of 1,511 feet above sea level to 33,345 feet, an increase of 31,834 feet, in 23 minutes and covering a distance of 150 nautical miles.
Following the enroute climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase, which started 7 miles south of Rokland in Nordland Fylke, Norway. This phase lasted for 46 minutes and covered a distance of 344 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its enroute descent, starting 11 miles southwest of Koppang in Innlandet, Norway. During this phase, the aircraft descended from an altitude of 34,022 feet to 8,772 feet, a decrease of 25,249 feet, in 12 minutes and covering a distance of 70 nautical miles.
The aircraft then entered another level cruise phase, which started 3 miles northeast of Hallingby in Viken, Norway. This phase lasted for 8 minutes and covered a distance of 31 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its final descent, starting 3 miles south of Asker in Viken, Norway. During this phase, the aircraft descended from an altitude of 8,058 feet to 1,935 feet, a decrease of 6,124 feet, in 7 minutes and covering a distance of 28 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 01L at ENGM Oslo Airport, Gardermoen was made from the south, with a heading of 16.0° at an altitude of 1,253 feet above ground level and 4 nautical miles from the runway. The aircraft landed on runway 01L, which had a length of 3,594 meters. The threshold height was slightly above the target, and the threshold speed was also slightly above the target at 138 knots.
The touchdown distance was good at 362 meters, but the touchdown speed was a little fast at 136 knots. The touchdown rate was hard at -445 feet per minute. The runway touchdown alignment was very good. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 2 °C, with a wind speed of 8 knots blowing from a direction of 340°. This resulted in a crosswind of 5 knots and a headwind of 7 knots.
After landing, the aircraft taxied to the parking area, a process that took 4 minutes and covered a distance of less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 633 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 107 minutes. The aircraft used a total of 4,564 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The Airbus A320 successfully landed on runway 01L at ENGM Oslo Airport, Gardermoen, with a score of 89.7%. The aircraft approached the runway from the south, heading 16.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,253 feet above ground level (agl). The final approach was conducted with a slight deviation in threshold height, being 59 feet agl, which was slightly above the target.
Upon touchdown, the aircraft's speed was 138 kt, which was also slightly above the target. However, the touchdown distance of 362 meters was considered good. The touchdown speed of 136 kt was a little fast, and the touchdown rate of -445 feet per minute (fpm) was hard. Despite this, the runway touchdown alignment was very good, indicating a precise and controlled landing.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 2°C, with a wind speed of 8 kt at 340°. The crosswind component was 5 kt, while the headwind component was 7 kt. These conditions did not appear to significantly impact the landing, as the total landing distance of 1,165 meters was only 32% of the runway length.
However, there was a notable issue with the runway rollout alignment, which was misaligned by 19.4 meters from the centreline. This suggests that the aircraft may have deviated from the intended path during the rollout phase, potentially due to factors such as brake application or steering input. Despite this, the overall landing performance was considered satisfactory, with a score of 89.7%.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values