The flight in the Li-2 Aeroflot USSR-69318 began with a 4-minute taxi from the parking to the runway at LRTC Cataloi. The departure roll on runway 34 covered less than 1 nm and the takeoff distance was 402 m, which was 20% of the runway length. The liftoff speed was 74 kn. The local weather at the time of departure was 14 °C with a wind speed of 17 kn at 339 °, resulting in a crosswind of 2 kn and a headwind of 17 kn.
After takeoff, the enroute climb began 1 mile north of LRTC Cataloi and lasted 2 minutes, during which the aircraft climbed from 849 ft asl to 2,322 ft asl, covering 3 nm. The enroute level cruise started 1 mile west of Mihail Kogalniceanu and lasted 5 minutes, covering 15 nm.
The landing took place on runway 36 at LRCK Constanta, which had a runway length of 3,495 m. The aircraft was at a height of 45 ft agl at the threshold with a speed of 71 kn. The touchdown occurred 671 m from the threshold with a touchdown speed of 67 kn and a VSI of -126 ft/m. The local weather at the time of landing was 15 °C with a wind speed of 12 kn at 349 °, resulting in a crosswind of 3 kn and a headwind of 12 kn. The total landing distance was 1,266 m, accounting for 36% of the runway length.
Finally, the taxi from the runway to the parking took 1 minute and covered less than 1 nm. The total flight distance was 50 nm, with a duration of 33 minutes, and the aircraft used 87 kg of fuel during the flight.
Replay this flight in 3D — the full flight path over the terrain with every stage, event and score along the route.
Taxiing from the parking to the runway took 4 minutes and covered less than 1 nm.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Average speed 6 kn 0 kn min to max 12 kn |
0 | 8 kn | |
| 100 % |
Average speed turning corners 0 kn max 0 kn |
0 | 0 kn | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 0.98 g 0.95 g min to max 1.00 g |
0.99 | 0.97 g | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 11.8 ° 11.7 ° min to max 11.9 ° |
11.9 | 11.7 ° | |
| Info |
Average bank angle 0.6 ° 0.6 ° min to max 0.7 ° |
0.6 | 0.6 ° | |
| Info |
Battery Master On at 06:25:59 |
|||
| Info |
Engine 2 Started at 06:25:59 |
|||
| Info |
Landing Gear Down at 06:25:59 |
|||
| Info |
Parking Brake On at 06:25:59 |
|||
| Info |
Engine 1 Started at 06:26:43 |
|||
| Info |
Parking Brake Off at 06:28:34 |
|||
| Info |
Strobe Lights Switched On at 06:28:36 |
|||
| Info |
Navigation Lights Switched On at 06:28:39 |
|||
| Info |
Taxi Lights Switched On at 06:28:40 |
|||
| Info |
Beacon Lights Switched On at 06:28:41 |
Entering runway 34 at LRTC Cataloi, Average speed was 16 kn.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| Info |
Average speed 33 kn 3 kn min to max 38 kn |
8 | 12 kn | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 11.3 ° 10.8 ° min to max 12.6 ° |
11.7 | 12.6 ° | |
| Info |
Average bank angle 0.1 ° 0.0 ° min to max 1.2 ° |
0.7 | 0.2 ° | |
| Info |
Average g force 0.98 g 0.96 g min to max 1.01 g |
0.97 | 0.96 g |
Departure roll runway 34 at LRTC Cataloi. Takeoff distance 402 m 20 % of runway. Liftoff speed was 74 kn. Local weather - Temperature 14 °C. Wind 17 kn at 339 °. Crosswind: 2 kn Headwind: 17 kn.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Takeoff distance 402 m 20 % of runway |
|||
| 97.56 % |
Liftoff speed was 74 kn Target 75 kn |
|||
| 79.57 % |
Runway alignment max 8.65 m 8.65 m left to 0.00 m left |
3.29 | 4.86 m | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 0.97 g 0.94 g min to max 1.02 g |
0.96 | 1.02 g | |
| 100 % |
Takeoff Bounce |
|||
| Info |
Average pitch angle 8.7 ° 6.6 ° min to max 13.0 ° |
12.6 | 9.0 ° | |
| Info |
Average bank angle 0.2 ° 0.0 ° min to max 0.6 ° |
0.1 | 0.1 ° | |
| 0 % |
Landing Lights at 06:31:27 |
Departure climb to 50 ft agl from runway 34 LRTC Cataloi.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Heading variation 0.2 ° -0.5 ° min to max 0.5 ° |
-0.5 | 0.5 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average speed 81 kn 74 kn min to max 86 kn |
74 | 85 kn | |
| 98.79 % |
Average bank angle 0.8 ° 0.0 ° min to max 2.5 ° |
0.1 | 2.5 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 0.99 g 0.88 g min to max 1.08 g |
1.02 | 0.99 g | |
| Info |
Average VSI 333 ft/m 80 ft/m min to max 582 ft/m |
270 | 348 ft/m | |
| Info |
Average altitude 25 ft agl 0 ft agl min to max 59 ft agl |
0 | 59 ft agl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 9.0 ° 7.5 ° min to max 10.5 ° |
9.0 | 8.6 ° | |
| Info |
Landing Gear Up at 06:31:55 |
Departure climb to 400 ft agl from 34 LRTC Cataloi.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Heading variation 0.0 ° -1.1 ° min to max 0.5 ° |
0.5 | -1.0 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average speed 91 kn 84 kn min to max 114 kn |
85 | 112 kn | |
| 89.63 % |
Average bank angle 1.9 ° 0.1 ° min to max 5.9 ° |
2.5 | 5.9 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.00 g 0.84 g min to max 1.06 g |
0.99 | 1.04 g | |
| Info |
Average VSI 465 ft/m 262 ft/m min to max 1,269 ft/m |
349 | 1,269 ft/m | |
| Info |
Average altitude 128 ft agl 60 ft agl min to max 466 ft agl |
60 | 466 ft agl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 8.3 ° 4.5 ° min to max 10.0 ° |
8.6 | 9.6 ° |
Departure climb to 1,000 ft agl from 34 LRTC Cataloi.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Heading variation -1.6 ° -2.3 ° min to max -1.1 ° |
-1.1 | -2.3 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average speed 109 kn 105 kn min to max 112 kn |
112 | 106 kn | |
| 55.03 % |
Average bank angle 13.3 ° 7.3 ° min to max 19.1 ° |
7.3 | 19.1 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.01 g 0.95 g min to max 1.05 g |
1.04 | 0.95 g | |
| 100 % |
Landing gear up |
|||
| Info |
Average VSI 1,486 ft/m 1,343 ft/m min to max 1,606 ft/m |
1,369 | 1,343 ft/m | |
| Info |
Average altitude 577 ft agl 489 ft agl min to max 665 ft agl |
489 | 665 ft agl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 10.8 ° 10.1 ° min to max 11.4 ° |
10.1 | 10.1 ° |
Enroute climb started 1 mile north of LRTC Cataloi Tulcea (Tulcea, Romania). Climbing from 849 ft asl to 2,322 ft asl, an increase of 1,473 ft in 2 minutes and covering 3 nm.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Average speed 114 kn 105 kn min to max 128 kn |
105 | 128 kn | |
| 100 % |
Average bank angle 10.9 ° 0.0 ° min to max 21.2 ° |
19.8 | 9.3 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.01 g 0.86 g min to max 1.30 g |
0.95 | 1.30 g | |
| Info |
Average VSI 762 ft/m -612 ft/m min to max 1,664 ft/m |
1,185 | -71 ft/m | |
| Info |
Average altitude 1,543 ft asl 849 ft asl min to max 2,343 ft asl |
849 | 2,322 ft asl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 6.4 ° -0.3 ° min to max 10.6 ° |
9.4 | 3.3 ° | |
| Info |
Turn coordination 0 0 min to max 0 |
0 | 0 |
Enroute level cruise started 1 mile west of Mihail Kogalniceanu (Tulcea, Romania) and lasted 5 minutes, covering 15 nm.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Average altitude 2,554 ft asl 2,324 ft asl min to max 2,789 ft asl |
2,325 | 2,503 ft asl | |
| 100 % |
Average speed 141 kn 124 kn min to max 162 kn |
129 | 159 kn | |
| 100 % |
Average bank angle 6.4 ° 0.0 ° min to max 19.7 ° |
8.7 | 0.8 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.01 g 0.92 g min to max 1.33 g |
0.96 | 0.99 g | |
| Info |
Turn coordination 0 0 min to max 0 |
0 | 0 | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 1.4 ° -2.3 ° min to max 5.4 ° |
2.4 | -1.8 ° | |
| Info |
Landing Lights Switched On at 06:35:20 |
|||
| Info |
Taxi Lights Switched Off at 06:35:20 |
|||
| Info |
Landing Lights Switched Off at 06:35:22 |
Arrival started 1 mile west of Mihail Kogalniceanu (Tulcea, Romania).
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Average speed 116 kn 72 kn min to max 161 kn |
160 | 88 kn | |
| 100 % |
Average bank angle 2.8 ° 0.0 ° min to max 21.2 ° |
0.5 | 3.4 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.00 g 0.77 g min to max 1.31 g |
0.98 | 1.09 g | |
| Info |
Average VSI -180 ft/m -1,344 ft/m min to max 842 ft/m |
-562 | -261 ft/m | |
| Info |
Average altitude 1,928 ft asl 524 ft asl min to max 2,553 ft asl |
2,484 | 524 ft asl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 1.4 ° -6.0 ° min to max 11.2 ° |
-1.9 | 1.6 ° | |
| Info |
Turn coordination 0 0 min to max 0 |
0 | 0 | |
| Info |
Flaps Position 1 at 06:46:32 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 2 at 06:46:41 |
|||
| Info |
Landing Lights Switched On at 06:47:03 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 3 at 06:49:29 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 4 at 06:49:34 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 3 at 06:50:31 |
|||
| Info |
Landing Gear Down at 06:51:58 |
|||
| Info |
Landing Gear Up at 06:52:08 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 4 at 06:52:29 |
Approaching runway 36 at LRCK Constanta from 1 nm to 0 nm. Descent from 190 ft agl to 41 ft agl. A decrease of 149 ft in 34 seconds.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Approach angle 2.8 ° 2.2 ° min to max 3.1 ° Target 3.0 ° |
2.3 | 3.1 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average speed 76 kn 71 kn min to max 89 kn |
89 | 71 kn | |
| 100 % |
Heading variation 0.2 ° 0.2 ° min to max 0.4 ° |
0.4 | 0.2 ° | |
| 99.97 % |
Average bank angle 0.9 ° 0.0 ° min to max 3.6 ° |
2.5 | 1.7 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.00 g 0.88 g min to max 1.12 g |
1.12 | 0.94 g | |
| Info |
Average VSI -261 ft/m -560 ft/m min to max 63 ft/m |
-30 | -415 ft/m | |
| Info |
Average altitude 71 ft agl 41 ft agl min to max 191 ft agl |
190 | 41 ft agl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 3.3 ° -0.8 ° min to max 4.1 ° |
2.9 | 2.4 ° | |
| Info |
Landing Gear Down at 06:53:29 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 3 at 06:53:46 |
|||
| Info |
Gear not down at 06:53:20 |
Landing on runway 36 at LRCK Constanta, runway length 3,495 m. Good threshold height. Threshold speed was slightly below target at 71 kn.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Threshold speed was slightly below target at 71 kn. Target 75 kn |
|||
| 100 % |
Target 50 ft agl |
|||
| 62.19 % |
Landing and flare profile |
|||
| 100 % |
Heading variation 0.2 ° 0.1 ° min to max 0.2 ° |
0.2 | 0.1 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average bank angle 0.8 ° 0.0 ° min to max 1.7 ° |
1.6 | 0.8 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.00 g 0.89 g min to max 1.15 g |
0.95 | 0.97 g | |
| Info |
Average speed 72 kn 66 kn min to max 76 kn |
71 | 67 kn | |
| Info |
Average VSI -110 ft/m -469 ft/m min to max 69 ft/m |
-422 | -126 ft/m | |
| Info |
Average altitude 17 ft agl 7 ft agl min to max 45 ft agl |
45 | 7 ft agl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 5.4 ° 2.4 ° min to max 7.0 ° |
2.4 | 6.7 ° |
Touchdown point was 231 m beyond the touchdown zone. Touchdown speed at 67 kn was good. Touchdown rate was smooth at -126 ft/m. Runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 6.3 m from centreline. Local weather - Temperature 15 °C. Wind 12 kn at 349 °. Crosswind: 3 kn Headwind: 12 kn.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 99.12 % |
Touchdown VSI was -126 ft/m. |
|||
| 76.63 % |
Touchdown distance was 671 m Target 457 m |
|||
| 100 % |
Speed at touchdown 67 kn Target 72 kn |
|||
| 88.16 % |
Runway alignment max 6.30 m 6.18 m left |
6.30 | 6.09 m | |
| 100 % |
Average bank angle 0.6 ° 0.5 ° min to max 0.8 ° |
0.8 | 0.5 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.10 g 0.97 g min to max 1.15 g |
0.97 | 1.08 g | |
| 80 % |
Landing Bounce |
|||
| Info |
Average speed 66 kn 65 kn min to max 67 kn |
67 | 65 kn | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 7.7 ° 6.7 ° min to max 8.5 ° |
6.7 | 8.5 ° |
Total landing distance 1,266 m, 36 % of runway. Runway rollout alignment was slightly misaligned by 15.0 m from centreline.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Landing distance 1,266 m 36 % of runway. |
|||
| 56.54 % |
Runway alignment max 14.97 m 14.97 m left to 0.00 m left |
6.08 | 7.92 m | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.00 g 0.84 g min to max 1.08 g |
1.08 | 0.98 g | |
| Info |
Average speed 48 kn 30 kn min to max 54 kn |
54 | 30 kn | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 6.8 ° 4.5 ° min to max 12.2 ° |
8.5 | 12.2 ° | |
| Info |
Average bank angle 0.8 ° 0.0 ° min to max 2.3 ° |
0.5 | 0.2 ° | |
| Info |
Flaps Fully Retracted at 06:54:26 |
Exiting runway, average speed 33 kn
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| Info |
Average speed 20 kn 16 kn min to max 30 kn |
30 | 18 kn | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 12.0 ° 11.8 ° min to max 12.3 ° |
12.2 | 12.2 ° | |
| Info |
Average bank angle 0.1 ° 0.0 ° min to max 0.3 ° |
0.1 | 0.1 ° | |
| Info |
Average g force 0.98 g 0.97 g min to max 0.99 g |
0.99 | 0.98 g | |
| Info |
Pitot Heat Switched On at 06:54:50 |
|||
| Info |
Pitot Heat Switched Off at 06:54:51 |
|||
| Info |
Landing Lights Switched Off at 06:55:26 |
|||
| Info |
Taxi Lights Switched On at 06:55:29 |
Taxiing to the parking from the runway took 1 minutes and covered less than 1 nm.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Average speed 13 kn 8 kn min to max 19 kn |
18 | 8 kn | |
| 100 % |
Average speed turning corners 0 kn max 0 kn |
0 | 0 kn | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 0.98 g 0.97 g min to max 1.01 g |
0.98 | 1.01 g | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 11.7 ° 11.6 ° min to max 12.2 ° |
12.2 | 11.8 ° | |
| Info |
Average bank angle 0.1 ° 0.0 ° min to max 0.3 ° |
0.2 | 0.3 ° | |
| Info |
Parking Brake On at 06:57:18 |
First and foremost, congratulations on achieving an aircraft landing score of 88.1%! This is a solid performance that reflects a high level of skill and precision in various phases of the landing process.
Let's start by analyzing the Approach Phase. It is evident that the glideslope alignment was excellent, indicating a smooth descent towards the runway. The slightly below target speed is a minor issue that can easily be corrected with more practice and attention to detail.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, it is commendable that the threshold height was good, showing a well-timed descent towards the runway. The fair landing flare suggests room for improvement in achieving a smoother transition from descent to touchdown. Ensuring a more precise and timely flare will contribute to a more controlled and stable landing.
In the Touchdown Phase, it is worth noting the smooth touchdown rate and on-target speed, which are essential factors in achieving a safe and comfortable landing. The touchdown point being 231 meters beyond the touchdown zone may indicate a slight overshoot, but the fact that the touchdown position was only 6.3 meters from the centerline is a positive sign of good alignment with the runway.
Finally, the Rollout Phase reveals a runway alignment of 15.0 meters from the centerline. While this is slightly off-center, it is still within an acceptable range and can be improved through practice and focus on maintaining alignment during the rollout.
Overall, your landing performance demonstrates a strong foundation in key landing phases, with areas for improvement that can be addressed through continued practice and attention to detail. Keep up the good work and strive for even greater precision in each phase of the landing process. With dedication and persistence, you can continue to refine your skills and achieve even higher landing scores in the future. Great job on your current performance!
Drag to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values