Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Maintain the centreline
A small uncorrected heading error at 40 knots becomes a metre of offset per second by 100 knots, noticed only at rotation, producing a crabbed liftoff. Root cause is nearly always eyes on the tape instead of the far end of the runway. Small heading changes displace a distant point visibly long before the nearby centreline stripes look wrong.
Read more in Improve Your Take-OffsStart to finish · 22 stages, 21 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 3,984 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 266 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, a landing score of 93.5% is impressive and shows that the pilot demonstrated a high level of skill and proficiency during the different phases of the landing process.
Starting with the Approach Phase, it is noted that the glideslope alignment was good. This indicates that the pilot was able to maintain the correct descent path towards the runway, ensuring a smooth and controlled approach. This is a crucial aspect of the landing process as it sets the foundation for a successful touchdown.
Moving onto the Landing Phase, it is commendable that the threshold height was below the target. This suggests that the pilot effectively managed the altitude during the final stages of the approach, allowing for a precise and timely touchdown. The great landing flare further highlights the pilot's ability to transition smoothly from descent to touchdown, ensuring a gentle and controlled landing.
In the Touchdown Phase, while the touchdown rate was noted as heavy, it is important to acknowledge that the speed was only slightly above the target. Despite this, the touchdown distance inside the touchdown zone and the runway touchdown position were very good. This indicates that the pilot was able to touch down in the intended landing zone and maintain proper alignment with the runway, ensuring a safe and efficient landing.
Finally, in the Rollout Phase, while the runway alignment was slightly off at 6.2m from the centerline, this minor deviation does not detract significantly from the overall successful landing.
In conclusion, the pilot should be commended for achieving a high landing score of 93.5%. This performance demonstrates skill, precision, and proficiency in handling the aircraft during the landing process. Moving forward, the pilot can continue to refine their technique and strive for even greater accuracy and consistency in all phases of landing. Keep up the excellent work!
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values