Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Arrival
Begin the flare with progressive back pressure and keep it coming until the sink is arrested, rather than flying it on flat.
What happened: The nose was barely raised in the flare and little of the sink was taken out, flying the aircraft onto the runway. This pattern usually carries through to a firm touchdown with a noticeable sink rate.
Watch for: Vertical speed indicator: a smoothly reducing sink through the normal flare band, not a steady rate into the runway.
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 20 stages, 18 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
At the 1,000 ft gate: speed above the reference speed.
At the 500 ft gate: speed above the reference speed.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,495 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 428 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with the aircraft taxiing from the parking area to the runway at Cork Airport, taking approximately 4 minutes to cover less than 1 nautical mile. The departure roll took place on runway 16, with the aircraft lifting off at a speed of 134 knots. The local weather conditions at the time of departure were characterized by a temperature of 9°C, with a wind speed of 10 knots from a direction of 210°.
The crosswind component was 8 knots, while the headwind component was 6 knots. The takeoff distance covered 40% of the runway, which was 837 meters long. The aircraft then began its enroute climb, starting overhead Ballygarvan in Munster, Ireland. The climb took 21 minutes to reach a height of 37,170 feet above sea level, an increase of 35,782 feet from the initial altitude of 1,388 feet. The aircraft covered a distance of 142 nautical miles during this phase.
Following the enroute climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase, starting 8 miles southwest of Lundy Island in Devon, England. This phase lasted for 7 minutes and covered a distance of 56 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its enroute descent, starting overhead Clyst Honiton in Devon, England. The descent took 20 minutes to reach a height of 4,279 feet above sea level, a decrease of 33,501 feet from the initial altitude of 37,781 feet. The aircraft covered a distance of 134 nautical miles during this phase.
The aircraft then entered another level cruise phase, starting 1 mile west of Buxted in East Sussex, England. This phase lasted for 8 minutes and covered a distance of 12 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its final descent, starting 1 mile east of Edenbridge in Kent, England. The descent took 3 minutes to reach a height of 1,465 feet above sea level, a decrease of 2,225 feet from the initial altitude of 3,690 feet. The aircraft covered a distance of 7 nautical miles during this phase.
The final approach to runway 26L at London Gatwick Airport took place from the east, with the aircraft heading 257.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,259 feet above ground level. The landing took place on a runway length of 2,495 meters, with a good threshold height. The threshold speed was well above the target speed at 150 knots. The touchdown distance was good at 429 meters, while the touchdown speed was fast at 140 knots. The touchdown rate was hard at -404 feet per minute.
The runway touchdown alignment was perfect, and the local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 11°C, with a wind speed of 19 knots from a direction of 200°. The crosswind component was 16 knots, while the headwind component was 10 knots. The total landing distance was 1,354 meters, which was 54% of the runway length. The runway rollout alignment was very good.
The aircraft then began its taxiing phase, taking 7 minutes to cover a distance of 1 nautical mile to reach the parking area. The total flight distance was 359 nautical miles, taking a total of 71 minutes. The aircraft used a total of 3,277 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The Airbus A321 aircraft successfully landed on runway 26L at EGKK London Gatwick Airport, achieving a score of 94.7%. The final approach was initiated from the east, heading 257.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,259 feet above ground level (agl). The aircraft's approach to the runway was precise, with a good threshold height and a well-above-target threshold speed of 150 knots.
Upon touchdown, the aircraft's performance was notable, with a touchdown distance of 429 meters, which was considered good. However, the touchdown speed of 140 knots was slightly faster than expected, indicating a potential for a harder landing. The touchdown rate of -404 feet per minute (fpm) was also hard, suggesting that the aircraft may have experienced a more forceful impact upon touchdown.
Despite the slightly faster touchdown speed and harder touchdown rate, the aircraft's runway touchdown alignment was perfect, indicating a high degree of control and precision during the landing. The local weather conditions at the time of the landing were characterized by a temperature of 11°C, with a wind speed of 19 knots at 200°. The crosswind component was 16 knots, while the headwind component was 10 knots.
The total landing distance of 1,354 meters was 54% of the runway length, which is a relatively short distance considering the aircraft's size and weight. The runway rollout alignment was also very good, indicating that the aircraft's brakes were applied smoothly and effectively, allowing for a controlled deceleration after touchdown. Overall, the landing was considered successful, with the aircraft achieving a high score and demonstrating a high degree of precision and control.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values