Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Use smaller, smoother aileron inputs to hold the climb bank angle near wings-level.
What happened: During Climb 3 the bank angle averaged 3.4°, well beyond a steady wings-level climb.
Watch for: Attitude indicator - bank angle, keeping it close to wings-level through the climb.
Arrival
Fly the flare as one continuous check of the sink rate from 26 ft, holding back pressure steadily rather than adjusting pitch piecemeal.
What happened: The flare drifted away from its intended profile rather than tracking it smoothly from 26 ft down to touchdown.
Watch for: Watch radio altitude and VSI through the flare, aiming to arrest the sink smoothly from 26 ft to touchdown.
See Arrival Landing
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 18 stages, 16 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with six checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
At the 1,000 ft gate: speed above the reference speed.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 4,190 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 465 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took 7 minutes and covered less than 1 nautical mile. The aircraft then departed from runway 35 at UBBB Heydar Aliyev International Airport in Baku, Azerbaijan. The takeoff distance was 630 meters, which accounted for 19% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 136 knots.
The local weather conditions at the time of departure were characterized by a temperature of 12°C, with a wind speed of 19 knots coming from a direction of 330°. This resulted in a crosswind of 9 knots and a headwind of 17 knots. The aircraft then began its enroute climb, which started overhead the airport and took the aircraft up to an altitude of 43,909 feet above sea level. This climb phase covered a distance of 98 nautical miles and took 21 minutes to complete.
Following the climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase, which lasted for 14 minutes and covered a distance of 104 nautical miles. This phase took place 72 miles southeast of Neftcala, Azerbaijan. The aircraft then began its enroute descent, which started 30 miles north of 'Abas Abad, Iran. The descent took the aircraft down from an altitude of 44,027 feet to 4,529 feet above sea level, covering a distance of 109 nautical miles in the process. This phase took 25 minutes to complete.
The final approach to runway 29R at OIIE Imam Khomeini International Airport was made from the east, with the aircraft heading 289.0° at an altitude of 1,235 feet above ground level and a distance of 4 nautical miles from the runway. The landing was made on the runway, which had a length of 4,190 meters. The threshold height at 66 feet above ground level was above the target, but the threshold speed was good at 122 knots.
The touchdown point was 166 meters beyond the touchdown zone, and the touchdown speed was a little fast at 118 knots. However, the touchdown rate was smooth at -111 feet per minute. The runway touchdown position was misaligned by 9.2 meters from the centerline. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 9°C, with a wind speed of 6 knots coming from a direction of 320°. This resulted in a crosswind of 3 knots and a headwind of 5 knots.
The total landing distance was 1,465 meters, which accounted for 35% of the runway. The runway rollout alignment was slightly misaligned by 7.8 meters from the centerline. The taxiing period from the runway to the parking took less than 1 minute and covered less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 318 nautical miles, and the flight took 66 minutes to complete. The aircraft used 984 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
Aircraft C750 successfully landed on runway 29R at OIIE Imam Khomeini International Airport, achieving a score of 93.7%. The final approach was initiated from the east, heading 289.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,235 feet above ground level (agl). The aircraft successfully touched down on the runway, but with a few minor deviations from the ideal landing performance.
The threshold height at 66 feet agl was above the target, indicating that the aircraft was slightly higher than desired when reaching the runway threshold. However, the threshold speed was good at 122 knots, demonstrating that the pilot maintained a suitable speed during the approach. The touchdown point was 166 meters beyond the touchdown zone, which is a relatively minor deviation. The touchdown speed of 118 knots was a little fast, but the touchdown rate was smooth at -111 feet per minute (fpm), indicating a controlled descent.
The runway touchdown position was misaligned by 9.2 meters from the centerline, which may have been due to a slight deviation in the pilot's alignment during the approach. The local weather conditions were relatively calm, with a temperature of 9°C, wind at 6 knots from 320°, and a crosswind of 3 knots and a headwind of 5 knots. These conditions were favorable for the landing, and the pilot was able to maintain control of the aircraft throughout the approach.
The total landing distance was 1,465 meters, which is 35% of the runway length. This is a relatively short landing distance, indicating that the pilot was able to maintain a good speed and control during the approach. However, the runway rollout alignment was slightly misaligned by 7.8 meters from the centerline, which may have been due to a slight deviation in the pilot's alignment during the rollout.
Overall, the landing performance of aircraft C750 was satisfactory, with a score of 93.7%. While there were a few minor deviations from the ideal landing performance, the pilot was able to maintain control of the aircraft throughout the approach and landing.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values