Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 29 stages, 28 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 1,663 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 302 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, this aircraft landing showed a mix of strengths and areas for improvement.
In the Approach Phase, it is important to note that the descent path was below the glideslope limit, which can be concerning but was offset by great heading alignment. Additionally, while the speed was a little below target, this can be easily rectified with practice and experience. Focus on maintaining a steady descent path and ensuring alignment with the runway for future approaches.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, it is evident that the threshold height was very low, indicating a strong approach to the runway. However, the poor landing flare suggests an opportunity to work on technique to ensure a smoother touchdown in the future. Paying closer attention to the landing flare can greatly improve the overall quality of the landing.
During the Touchdown Phase, the touchdown rate was excellent, demonstrating skill and precision. Although the speed was slightly above target, this can also be improved with practice. Additionally, the touchdown distance within the touchdown zone and the runway touchdown position being 1.7 meters from the centerline are positive indicators of accuracy and control during this phase.
Lastly, in the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment was very good, showcasing strong control of the aircraft during the final moments of the landing.
Overall, this aircraft landing shows potential for growth and improvement. With continued practice and focus on areas of weakness, such as maintaining descent path, perfecting the landing flare, and fine-tuning approach speed, you can achieve even greater precision and control in future landings. Keep up the good work and continue striving for excellence in every phase of the landing process.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values