Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Raise the gear lever promptly once a positive climb is confirmed, before reaching the target retraction height.
What happened: Gear retraction was delayed, with the gear not coming up until 0 m.
Watch for: Landing gear: up by the normal retraction gate
Arrival
Add power earlier on final to hold VREF of 137 kt by the gates rather than let speed decay.
What happened: The approach was flown too slow through the stabilisation gates, crossing the threshold at 131 kt against a VREF of 137 kt.
Watch for: Airspeed indicator against 137 kt from the first stabilisation gate onward.
See Arrival Approach
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 20 stages, 19 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 305 m and 152 m above the runway. They are the approach's score: the checks passed out of the checks that ran.
At the 305 m gate: speed 7 kt SLOW on the reference speed of 137 kt.
At the 152 m gate: speed 6 kt SLOW on the reference speed of 137 kt.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 3,448 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 505 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The 2.26 G arrival is the firm side of smooth.
The rest of the report
Aircraft departed from Munich Airport (EDDM), runway 26R, on a clear morning with a temperature of 10 °C and a gentle headwind of 2 kt. The takeoff roll was smooth, covering 2,519 meters, or 63% of the runway, before lifting off at a speed of 156 kt. The aircraft then began its enroute climb, ascending from 759 meters above sea level to 11,477 meters, a gain of 10,717.5 meters, in just 19 minutes while covering 103 nautical miles.
The climb phase was followed by a series of level cruises, with the aircraft maintaining a steady altitude over various points in Germany and the Netherlands. Notably, the first level cruise phase lasted 25 minutes, covering 155 nautical miles, while the subsequent level cruises were much shorter, lasting only 2 minutes each. The aircraft then began its descent, gradually losing altitude as it approached its destination, Amsterdam Airport Schiphol (EHAM). The final descent phase was initiated 1 mile north of Driemond, with the aircraft touching down on runway 27 after a total descent of 7,081.1 meters in 11 minutes.
The landing was executed smoothly, with the aircraft touching down 89 meters beyond the touchdown zone at a speed of 127 kt. The touchdown rate was good at -0.9 m/s, and the runway rollout alignment was very good. The total landing distance was 1,217 meters, or 36% of the runway. Following the landing, the aircraft taxied to the parking area, covering 1 nautical mile in 8 minutes. The total flight distance was 385 nautical miles, and the aircraft used 2,908 kg of fuel during the flight.
The final approach to runway 27 at EHAM Amsterdam Airport Schiphol from the east was executed with precision, with the aircraft maintaining a heading of 267.0° at 4 nm and 399.0 m above ground level. The approach quality was satisfactory, with a good threshold height and a threshold speed of 132 kt, which was within the acceptable range. The aircraft touched down 89 m beyond the touchdown zone, with a touchdown speed of 127 kt, which was also within the acceptable limits. The touchdown rate of -0.9 m/s was good, indicating a controlled descent.
Upon touchdown, the aircraft's runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 5.9 m from the centreline, which was a minor deviation from the ideal alignment. However, the runway rollout alignment was very good, with the aircraft maintaining a stable and consistent path along the runway. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 11 °C and a wind speed of 4 kt at 303°, contributed to a relatively calm and stable environment for the landing. The crosswind component was minimal at 2 kt, while the headwind component was 3 kt, which helped to reduce the aircraft's ground speed and improve the landing performance.
The total landing distance of 1,217 m was 36% of the runway length, which was within the acceptable range. Overall, the landing performance was satisfactory, with a score of 97.2%. The minor deviation from the centreline and the slightly beyond-threshold touchdown point were the only notable deviations from the ideal landing performance. Nevertheless, the aircraft's ability to maintain a stable and controlled descent, combined with a good rollout alignment, ensured a safe and successful landing.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values