Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Arrival
Fly the flare as one continuous check of the sink rate from 9.7 ft, holding back pressure steadily rather than adjusting pitch piecemeal.
What happened: The flare drifted away from its intended profile rather than tracking it smoothly from 9.7 ft down to touchdown.
Watch for: Watch radio altitude and VSI through the flare, aiming to arrest the sink smoothly from 9.7 ft to touchdown.
See Arrival Landing
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 22 stages, 20 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 2,059 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 2,059 m of the 3,350 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 743 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with the Boeing 777-300 taxiing from the parking area to the runway at LEBL Josep Tarradellas Barcelona-El Prat Airport, taking 7 minutes and covering a distance of 2 nautical miles. The departure roll took place on runway 24R, with a takeoff distance of 1,154 meters, which is 40% of the runway length. The aircraft lifted off at a speed of 170 knots.
As the aircraft took to the skies, it encountered local weather conditions of 25°C temperature and a wind speed of 6 knots at 210°. The crosswind was 3 knots, while the headwind was 5 knots. The enroute climb started overhead the airport, with the aircraft ascending from 1,025 feet above sea level to 33,266 feet, an increase of 32,241 feet in 16 minutes, covering a distance of 93 nautical miles.
The enroute level cruise began 4 miles southwest of Pueyo de Santa Cruz, Spain, and lasted for 151 minutes, covering a distance of 1,150 nautical miles. The aircraft then underwent another enroute climb, this time from 34,006 feet to 36,680 feet, an increase of 2,674 feet in 3 minutes, covering a distance of 29 nautical miles. The level cruise resumed at a new location, lasting for 162 minutes and covering 1,309 nautical miles.
The aircraft then underwent another enroute climb, ascending from 36,743 feet to 37,985 feet, an increase of 1,242 feet in 2 minutes, covering a distance of 14 nautical miles. The level cruise resumed once again, lasting for 78 minutes and covering 609 nautical miles. As the aircraft approached its destination, it began its descent, starting 2 miles southwest of Disraeli, Quebec, Canada. The descent took place from 38,444 feet to 1,401 feet, a decrease of 37,044 feet in 24 minutes, covering a distance of 106 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 06L at CYUL Montreal / Pierre Elliott Trudeau International Airport took place from the southwest, heading 42.0° at 4 nautical miles and 1,270 feet above ground level. The landing took place on the runway, which is 3,350 meters long. The threshold height was slightly above target, while the threshold speed was also slightly above target at 148 knots.
The touchdown point was 332 meters beyond the touchdown zone, with a touchdown speed of 143 knots, which was a little fast. However, the touchdown rate was smooth at -130 feet per minute. The runway touchdown alignment was very good, and the runway rollout alignment was perfect. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were 19°C temperature and a wind speed of 4 knots at 330°, with a crosswind of 4 knots and a headwind of 1 knot.
The total landing distance was 1,984 meters, which is 59% of the runway length. The taxiing to the parking area from the runway took 6 minutes and covered a distance of 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 3,319 nautical miles, taking a total of 451 minutes, and the aircraft used 56,252 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The Boeing 777-300 aircraft successfully landed at Montreal / Pierre Elliott Trudeau International Airport (CYUL) on runway 06L. The final approach was initiated from the southwest, heading 42.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,270 feet above ground level (agl). The aircraft's performance during the landing was evaluated, and it scored 92.3%.
The landing was conducted with a slight deviation from the target threshold height, which was 56 feet agl. However, the threshold speed of 148 knots was also slightly above the target. Despite these minor deviations, the touchdown point was 332 meters beyond the touchdown zone, indicating a slight overextension of the landing. The touchdown speed of 143 knots was a little fast, but the touchdown rate was smooth at -130 feet per minute (fpm).
The runway touchdown alignment was very good, indicating that the aircraft was properly aligned with the runway during the landing. The local weather conditions at the time of the landing were favorable, with a temperature of 19°C and a wind speed of 4 knots at 330°. The crosswind component was 4 knots, while the headwind component was 1 knot. These conditions did not appear to have a significant impact on the landing.
The total landing distance was 1,984 meters, which accounted for 59% of the runway length. This is a relatively short landing distance, indicating that the aircraft was able to touch down and come to a stop within a reasonable distance. The runway rollout alignment was perfect, indicating that the aircraft was properly aligned with the runway during the rollout phase of the landing.
Overall, the landing was successful, and the aircraft's performance was satisfactory. However, there were some minor deviations from the target parameters, which could be addressed through further training and practice.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values