Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 18 stages, 17 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,750 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,750 m of the 2,128 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 543 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
While achieving an aircraft landing score of 80.2% is a commendable feat, there are areas for improvement that can help elevate your performance to even greater heights.
Firstly, in the Approach Phase, it was noted that the descent path was above the glideslope limit. This is a crucial aspect of the landing process and maintaining a proper descent path is essential for a smooth and safe touchdown. By focusing on staying within the designated glideslope limits, you can ensure a more precise approach to the runway.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, it was observed that the threshold height was excessively over the target and the landing flare was very poor. These factors can impact the smoothness and accuracy of the touchdown, leading to a less than optimal landing experience. By working on honing your skills in these areas, you can achieve a more controlled landing with a precise touchdown point, ultimately improving your overall landing performance.
Additionally, in the Touchdown Phase, it was noted that the touchdown rate was very hard and the speed was slightly above target. Furthermore, the touchdown point was 79 meters beyond the designated zone. By focusing on adjusting your approach speed and touchdown technique, you can achieve a softer and more accurate touchdown, reducing the impact on the aircraft and ensuring a safer landing experience.
On a positive note, it is worth mentioning that the runway touchdown position and alignment during the Rollout Phase were very good. This indicates that you have a strong understanding of maintaining proper alignment on the runway post-landing, which is essential for a smooth and efficient rollout.
Overall, while there are areas for improvement, your current landing score demonstrates a solid foundation in aircraft landing techniques. By addressing the noted areas of concern and continuing to fine-tune your skills, you can further enhance your performance and strive for even greater success in future landings. Keep up the good work and continue to focus on refining your approach, touchdown, and rollout techniques. With dedication and practice, you can achieve even higher scores and elevate your overall landing proficiency.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values