Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Maintain the centreline
A small uncorrected heading error at 40 knots becomes a metre of offset per second by 100 knots, noticed only at rotation, producing a crabbed liftoff. Root cause is nearly always eyes on the tape instead of the far end of the runway. Small heading changes displace a distant point visibly long before the nearby centreline stripes look wrong.
Read more in Improve Your Take-OffsStart to finish · 22 stages, 20 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,223 m of the approach.
Plan view — the full 1,223 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 265 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, the aircraft landing score of 97.5% is a very good result, and there are several positive aspects to highlight in this analysis.
During the Approach Phase, while there was a descent path below the glideslope limit, the speed being slightly below target is a minor issue that can easily be corrected with practice and adjustments. It's great to see that there was good threshold height and a great landing flare during the Landing Phase, indicating good control and coordination during this critical phase of the landing process.
In terms of areas for improvement, the poor landing heading and bank angle stability during landing are opportunities to focus on technique and precision. By working on maintaining better alignment and stability during the final stages of landing, the overall quality of the landing can be improved.
In the Touchdown Phase, the firm touchdown rate can be addressed by aiming for a smoother touchdown in future landings. However, it's fantastic to see that the speed was on target, the touchdown distance was inside the touchdown zone, and the runway touchdown position was only 4.1 meters from the centerline, indicating good accuracy and control during this phase.
Lastly, in the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment being 6.1 meters from the centerline is another area for improvement to focus on in future landings. By working on maintaining better alignment during the rollout, the overall landing performance can be further enhanced.
Overall, this analysis provides a detailed breakdown of the various phases of the landing process, highlighting both strengths and areas for improvement. With continued practice and focus on key aspects such as alignment, stability, and touchdown technique, even better landing scores can be achieved in the future. Keep up the good work and keep striving for improvement – the sky's the limit!
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values