Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Roll the wings level with aileron and hold bank within limits as you establish the climb.
What happened: Bank increased to 1.3° during the initial climb, and wings stayed over-banked at 3.3° into the next climb segment.
Watch for: Attitude indicator bank angle, aiming to keep it near wings-level
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 20 stages, 18 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 305 m and 152 m above the runway.
At the 305 m gate: speed below the reference speed.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 1,757 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 471 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with the aircraft taxiing from the parking area to the runway, a process that took 7 minutes and covered less than 1 nautical mile. The Airbus A320 then departed from runway 10 at SBGL Rio Galeão – Tom Jobim International Airport, with a takeoff distance of 1,563 meters, which was 39% of the runway length. The liftoff speed was 153 knots.
As the aircraft climbed out of the airport, it began its enroute climb 2 miles northeast of SBGL Rio Galeão – Tom Jobim International Airport. The climb took 14 minutes and covered 55 nautical miles, with the aircraft rising from an altitude of 294 meters above sea level to 9,005 meters above sea level, an increase of 8,711.6 meters.
After reaching the desired altitude, the aircraft entered a level cruise, starting 21 miles south of SDMR Marambaia Airport. This phase of the flight lasted 10 minutes and covered 71 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its enroute descent 7 miles east of Ilhabela, descending from 9,014 meters above sea level to 1,800 meters above sea level, a decrease of 7,214.1 meters in 16 minutes, covering 86 nautical miles.
The aircraft then entered another level cruise, starting 1 mile north of Taboao da Serra, which lasted 3 minutes and covered 6 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its final descent 1 mile northeast of Osasco, descending from 1,666 meters above sea level to 1,162 meters above sea level, a decrease of 504 meters in 2 minutes, covering 6 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 17R at SBSP Congonhas Airport was made from the northwest, with the aircraft heading 148.0 degrees at 4 nautical miles and 363.6 meters above ground level. The landing was successful, with the touchdown point being 54 meters beyond the touchdown zone. The touchdown speed was 128 knots, which was good, and the touchdown rate was perfect at 0.7 meters per second.
The total landing distance was 1,106 meters, which was 63% of the runway length. The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned from the centerline by 9.6 meters. The runway rollout alignment was also slightly misaligned from the centerline by 10.3 meters. The flight then ended with the aircraft taxiing to the parking area, a process that took 2 minutes and covered less than 1 nautical mile.
The total flight distance was 230 nautical miles, and the flight took 59 minutes. The aircraft used 2,383 kilograms of fuel during the flight. The local temperature was 24 degrees Celsius throughout the flight.
The Airbus A320 successfully landed on runway 17R at SBSP Congonhas Airport, achieving a high score of 95.6%. The aircraft approached the runway from the northwest, heading 148.0° at an altitude of 363.6 meters above ground level (agl) and a distance of 4 nautical miles from the runway.
The pilot executed a smooth final approach, maintaining a good threshold height and speed of 135 knots. The touchdown point was 54 meters beyond the designated touchdown zone, but the touchdown speed of 128 knots was within the acceptable range. The touchdown rate of 0.7 meters per second was also perfect, indicating a controlled and gentle touchdown.
However, there were some minor deviations from the ideal landing performance. The runway touchdown position was misaligned by 9.6 meters from the centerline, and the runway rollout alignment was slightly off by 10.3 meters from the centerline. Despite these minor discrepancies, the overall landing distance of 1,106 meters was only 63% of the available runway length, indicating a safe and controlled landing.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were favorable, with a temperature of 24°C. The pilot's ability to navigate the aircraft through the final approach and landing phases was impressive, considering the minor deviations from the ideal performance. Overall, the landing was considered successful, and the pilot's skills and experience were demonstrated through this achievement.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values