Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Use smaller, smoother aileron inputs to hold the climb bank angle near wings-level.
What happened: During Climb 3 the bank angle averaged 2.8°, well beyond a steady wings-level climb.
Watch for: Attitude indicator - bank angle, keeping it close to wings-level through the climb.
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 18 stages, 16 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
At the 1,000 ft gate: speed above the reference speed.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 3,509 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 213 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking area to the runway, which took approximately 2 minutes and covered less than 1 nautical mile. The aircraft, a Boeing 737-700, then departed from runway 34 at KRDD Redding Municipal Airport. The takeoff distance was 1,195 meters, which accounted for 56% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 153 knots.
The local weather conditions at the time of departure were characterized by a temperature of 10 degrees Celsius, with a wind speed of 2 knots at 150 degrees. This resulted in a crosswind of 1 knot and a tailwind of 2 knots. The aircraft then began its enroute climb, starting 1 mile north of KRDD Redding Municipal Airport. The climb took 43 minutes and covered a distance of 282 nautical miles, with the aircraft ascending from 1,498 feet above sea level to 38,989 feet above sea level, an increase of 37,491 feet.
Following the enroute climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase, which started 5 miles southwest of Coalinga, California. This phase lasted for 102 minutes and covered a distance of 1,129 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its enroute descent, starting 7 miles east of MM96 El Temazcal Airport in Chalchihuites, Mexico. The descent took 8 minutes and covered a distance of 208 nautical miles, with the aircraft descending from 39,414 feet above sea level to 6,707 feet above sea level, a decrease of 32,707 feet.
The final approach to runway 31 at MMLO Aeropuerto Internacional del Bajío was made from the southeast, with the aircraft heading 314.0 degrees at 4 nautical miles and 774 feet above ground level. The landing was successful, with the touchdown speed being 121 knots and the touchdown distance being 212 meters. The touchdown rate was fair at -233 feet per minute, and the runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 5.7 meters from the centerline.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 12 degrees Celsius. The total landing distance was 745 meters, which accounted for 21% of the runway. The runway rollout alignment was very good. The taxiing period from the runway to the parking area took approximately 1 minute and covered less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 1,625 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 158 minutes. The aircraft used 9,725 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The Boeing 737-700 aircraft successfully landed at MMLO Aeropuerto Internacional del Bajío, achieving a high score of 98.2%. The final approach to runway 31 was conducted from the south east, with the aircraft heading 314.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 774 feet above ground level (agl).
The landing was executed smoothly, with a good threshold height and a threshold speed of 124 knots. The touchdown distance was also within acceptable limits, measuring 212 meters. The touchdown speed of 121 knots was satisfactory, indicating a controlled descent. However, the touchdown rate of -233 feet per minute (fpm) was only fair, suggesting that the aircraft could have been brought down more gently.
Upon touchdown, the aircraft landed slightly off-centerline, deviating by 5.7 meters from the runway centerline. This minor misalignment may have been due to factors such as wind or pilot error. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 12°C, which may have affected the aircraft's performance.
The total landing distance of 745 meters was relatively short, accounting for only 21% of the runway length. This indicates that the aircraft was able to stop quickly and efficiently after touchdown. The runway rollout alignment was also very good, suggesting that the pilots maintained control of the aircraft during the post-landing phase.
Overall, the landing was successful, with the aircraft achieving a high score and demonstrating good control and precision. However, there is room for improvement in terms of touchdown rate and centerline alignment.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values