Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Use smaller, smoother aileron inputs to hold the climb bank angle near wings-level.
What happened: During Climb 3 the bank angle averaged 17°, well beyond a steady wings-level climb.
Watch for: Attitude indicator - bank angle, keeping it close to wings-level through the climb.
Arrival
Hold approach power to keep the threshold speed at 117 kt instead of letting it decay below it.
What happened: The sink was arrested at 11 ft while already below VREF at 107 kt, and the aircraft settled as the speed ran out - this pattern usually carries through to a bounce at touchdown.
Watch for: Watch the airspeed indicator against 117 kt on short final.
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 21 stages, 19 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: six checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
At the 500 ft gate: sink rate above what the glideslope needed, off the runway's 3° glideslope and off the centreline.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 8,290 ft of the approach.
Plan view — the first 8,290 ft of the 10,562 ft runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 4,335 ft past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with taxiing from the parking to the runway, which took 14 minutes and covered a distance of 1 nautical mile. The aircraft then departed from runway 03 at Yangon International Airport, with a takeoff distance of 3,302 feet, which was 29% of the runway length. The liftoff speed was 155 knots.
As the aircraft climbed out of Yangon International Airport, it encountered local weather conditions of 80°F temperature and a 4-knot wind at 119°. The enroute climb started 1 mile northeast of the airport and continued for 17 minutes, covering a distance of 120 nautical miles. The aircraft climbed from 919 feet above sea level to 44,618 feet above sea level, an increase of 43,699 feet.
After reaching the cruising altitude, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase, which started 28 miles east of Thandwe Airport. This phase lasted for 38 minutes and covered a distance of 333 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its descent, which started 34 miles south of Mathba in Bangladesh. The descent from 44,701 feet above sea level to 2,012 feet above sea level took 17 minutes and covered a distance of 106 nautical miles.
The aircraft then entered another level cruise phase, which started 3 miles east of Ramchandrapur in India. This phase lasted for only 2 minutes and covered a distance of 3 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its final descent, which started 1 mile south of Ramchandrapur. The descent from 1,719 feet above sea level to 1,056 feet above sea level took 2 minutes and covered a distance of 3 nautical miles.
The aircraft then entered another level cruise phase, which started 1 mile southeast of Sankarpur in India. This phase lasted for 3 minutes and covered a distance of 6 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its final approach to runway 19L at Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose International Airport, heading 188.0° at 4 nautical miles and 607 feet above ground level.
The landing on runway 19L was successful, with a touchdown point 2,976 feet beyond the touchdown zone. The touchdown speed was 96 knots, which was good, but the touchdown rate was fair at -262 feet per minute. The runway touchdown position was significantly misaligned by 89 feet from the centreline. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were 81°F temperature and a 6-knot wind at 53°.
The total landing distance was 8,023 feet, which was 76% of the runway length. The runway rollout alignment was also significantly misaligned by 135 feet from the centreline. The taxiing to the parking from the runway took 6 minutes and covered less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 580 nautical miles, and the flight used 2,912 pounds of fuel.
Aircraft C750 successfully landed on runway 19L at VECC Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose International Airport, but with some notable deviations from ideal landing parameters. The aircraft's final approach was initiated from the north, heading 188.0° at 4 nautical miles and 607 feet above ground level (agl). The pilot maintained a good threshold height, but the threshold speed was slightly below the target at 107 knots.
Upon touchdown, the aircraft landed 2,976 feet beyond the touchdown zone, which is a significant deviation from the ideal landing point. The touchdown speed of 96 knots was within the acceptable range, but the touchdown rate of -262 feet per minute (fpm) was only fair. This indicates that the aircraft may have experienced some deceleration issues during the landing roll.
The runway touchdown position was also significantly misaligned by 89 feet from the centreline, which could have contributed to the aircraft's deviation from the ideal landing point. Additionally, the runway rollout alignment was also misaligned by 135 feet from the centreline, indicating that the aircraft may have experienced some directional control issues during the landing roll.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were relatively calm, with a temperature of 81°F and winds of 6 knots at 53°. The crosswind component was 5 knots, while the tailwind component was 4 knots. Despite these conditions, the pilot was able to maintain control of the aircraft and bring it to a safe stop.
Overall, while the landing was successful, there were some notable deviations from ideal landing parameters. The pilot may need to review and refine their landing technique to improve the accuracy and consistency of their landings.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values