Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Make small rudder corrections against a point at the far end to hold the centreline.
What happened: During the ground roll you drifted 19 m off the runway centreline.
Watch for: Watch runway alignment against the centreline, correcting with small rudder inputs.
See Departure Roll
Arrival
Keep the back pressure coming through the flare so the sink does not return at 558 fpm.
What happened: The flare arrested the sink, but then the sink returned before touchdown.
Watch for: Watch the VSI in the flare and keep arrested sink from returning before touchdown at 489 fpm.
See Arrival Landing
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 14 stages, 13 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: seven checks where the approach path is 152 m above the runway. The 305 m gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
At the 152 m gate: off the centreline and speed below the reference speed.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 1,695 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 776 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with the aircraft, an Airbus A320, taxiing from the parking area to the runway at Djerba Zarzis International Airport, taking approximately 8 minutes to cover a distance of 1 nautical mile. The departure roll took place on runway 09, with the aircraft taking off after covering 53% of the runway's length. The takeoff distance was 1,628 meters, and the liftoff speed was 157 knots.
As the aircraft climbed out of Djerba Zarzis International Airport, it began its enroute climb, starting 1 mile east of the airport and reaching an altitude of 11,272 meters above sea level. The climb was a significant increase of 10,983.5 meters in just 19 minutes, covering a distance of 117 nautical miles. The local weather conditions at the time were characterized by a temperature of 31 degrees Celsius.
Following the enroute climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase, which started 13 miles south-west of Lampedusa, Sicilia, Italy. This phase lasted for 7 minutes and covered a distance of 81 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its enroute descent, starting 31 miles west of San Lawrenz, Malta. The descent was a significant decrease of 11,228.9 meters in 29 minutes, covering a distance of 144 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 33 at Reggio Calabria Airport was made from the south-east, with the aircraft heading 335.0 degrees at an altitude of 35.5 meters above ground level. The landing took place on a runway with a length of 1,695 meters, and the threshold height was well above the target. The threshold speed was good at 137 knots, and the touchdown speed was 125 knots, which was also good. The touchdown rate was good at -0.9 meters per second, and the runway touchdown alignment was very good.
The total landing distance was 1,370 meters, which was 81% of the runway's length. The runway rollout alignment was perfect, and the aircraft taxied to the parking area from the runway in just 2 minutes, covering a distance of less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 346 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 63 minutes. The aircraft used 2,220 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The Airbus A320 successfully landed at Reggio Calabria Airport, achieving an overall score of 85.9%. The aircraft approached the runway from the southeast, heading 335.0° at an altitude of 35.5 meters above ground level (agl) and 0 nautical miles from the runway. The final approach was executed with precision, and the aircraft landed on runway 33, which has a length of 1,695 meters.
The threshold height at 22.7 meters agl was above the target, indicating that the aircraft was slightly higher than desired at the point of touchdown. However, the threshold speed of 137 knots was within the acceptable range, demonstrating good control and management of the aircraft's descent. The touchdown point was 357 meters beyond the touchdown zone, which is a relatively safe distance, and the touchdown speed of 125 knots was also within the acceptable range.
The touchdown rate of -0.9 meters per second was good, indicating a smooth and controlled touchdown. The runway touchdown alignment was very good, suggesting that the aircraft was properly aligned with the runway and that the pilot had good control over the aircraft's descent. The local weather conditions at the time of the landing were hot, with a temperature of 33°C, which may have presented some challenges for the pilot.
The total landing distance of 1,370 meters was 81% of the runway length, which is a relatively short distance considering the aircraft's size and weight. This suggests that the pilot had good control over the aircraft's descent and that the landing was executed with precision. The runway rollout alignment was perfect, indicating that the aircraft was properly aligned with the runway after touchdown and that the pilot had good control over the aircraft's movement during the rollout phase. Overall, the landing was executed with good precision and control, and the pilot demonstrated good skills and experience.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values