Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Monitor your speed
Below 10,000 ft you are typically limited to 250 kt indicated (a US rule that much of the world mirrors in some form, though not universally). This forces a deceleration around 10,000 ft whether the profile wants one or not, so plan for it rather than discovering it.
Start to finish · 20 stages, 18 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,944 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 235 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with the Airbus A320 taxiing from the parking area to the runway at Charles de Gaulle International Airport, located at LFPG. This process took 8 minutes and covered a distance of 3 nautical miles. The aircraft then departed from runway 27L, with a takeoff distance of 1,566 meters, which accounted for 44% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 155 knots.
As the aircraft took to the skies, it encountered local weather conditions of 10°C temperature and a wind speed of 3 knots at 180 degrees. The crosswind was 3 knots, while the headwind was 0 knots. The aircraft then began its enroute climb, starting overhead Roissy-en-France, and continued to ascend from 1,392 feet above sea level to 37,758 feet above sea level, an increase of 36,367 feet in 14 minutes, covering a distance of 98 nautical miles.
The enroute descent started 1 mile north of Wez-Velvain, Belgium, where the aircraft descended from 38,494 feet above sea level to 35,384 feet above sea level, a decrease of 3,110 feet in 2 minutes, covering 11 nautical miles. The aircraft then entered a level cruise, starting 1 mile east of EBAM Amougies Airfield Mont-de-l'Enclus, and lasted for 39 minutes, covering 548 nautical miles.
The enroute descent started 9 miles southwest of Stroemstad, Sweden, where the aircraft descended from 35,102 feet above sea level to 5,033 feet above sea level, a decrease of 30,069 feet in 15 minutes, covering 98 nautical miles. The aircraft then entered another level cruise, starting 2 miles northwest of Sand, Norway, and lasted for 2 minutes, covering 6 nautical miles.
The final enroute descent started 5 miles southeast of Langset, Norway, where the aircraft descended from 5,002 feet above sea level to 1,568 feet above sea level, a decrease of 3,434 feet in 4 minutes, covering 9 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its final approach to runway 19L at Oslo Airport, Gardermoen, from the north, heading 197.0 degrees at 2 nautical miles and 882 feet above ground level.
The landing on runway 19L was successful, with a touchdown distance of 237 meters, which was good. The touchdown speed was 135 knots, which was a little fast, and the touchdown rate was hard at -481 feet per minute. The runway touchdown alignment was very good, and the local weather conditions were 2°C temperature and a wind speed of 2 knots at 200 degrees.
The total landing distance was 1,323 meters, which accounted for 45% of the runway. The runway rollout alignment was perfect, and the aircraft then began taxiing to the parking area, which took 3 minutes and covered less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 777 nautical miles, taking 86 minutes, and the aircraft used 5,662 kilograms of fuel.
The Airbus A320 successfully landed at ENGM Oslo Airport, Gardermoen, with a score of 97.2%. The aircraft approached the runway from the north, heading 197.0° at 2 nautical miles and 882 feet above ground level (agl). The final approach was executed with precision, and the aircraft landed on runway 19L, which has a length of 2,944 meters.
The threshold height was good, indicating that the aircraft was at the correct altitude as it approached the runway. The threshold speed of 138 knots was also satisfactory, demonstrating that the pilots had maintained control and were on track for a smooth landing. The touchdown distance of 237 meters was within acceptable limits, further indicating a well-executed landing.
However, there were a few areas for improvement. The touchdown speed of 135 knots was slightly faster than desired, which may have contributed to a harder touchdown rate of -481 feet per minute (fpm). A faster touchdown speed can result in a more abrupt landing, which may be uncomfortable for passengers and potentially damage the aircraft.
Despite these minor issues, the aircraft's runway touchdown alignment was very good, indicating that the pilots had maintained control and were aligned with the runway as they touched down. The local weather conditions were also favorable, with a temperature of 2°C and a gentle headwind of 2 knots at 200°. The crosswind was negligible, with a speed of 0 knots.
The total landing distance of 1,323 meters was 45% of the runway length, which is a reasonable distance considering the aircraft's size and weight. The runway rollout alignment was perfect, indicating that the pilots had maintained control and were able to bring the aircraft to a stop smoothly and safely. Overall, the landing was a success, with the aircraft coming to a stop within a safe distance from the runway threshold.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values