Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 25 stages, 23 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,933 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,933 m of the 3,123 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 888 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, the aircraft landing score of 89.7% indicates a decent performance, with room for improvement in certain areas.
Let's start by focusing on the positive aspects of the landing. The Approach Phase was particularly strong, with excellent glideslope alignment and speed well above target. This demonstrates a high level of precision and control during the descent towards the runway.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, there were a few areas that could use some fine-tuning. While the threshold height was above target, indicating good situational awareness, the landing flare was noted as very poor. This suggests that there may have been a lack of smoothness in the final moments before touchdown.
In the Touchdown Phase, the touchdown rate was good and the speed was slightly above target. However, the touchdown point being 480 m beyond the touchdown zone is something to be mindful of for future landings. Additionally, the runway touchdown position being 2.9 m from the centerline may have caused some deviation from the intended path.
Lastly, in the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment was slightly off at 4.6 m from the centerline. This could have been a result of the earlier deviations in the touchdown phase, but it's important to strive for a more precise alignment during the rollout to ensure a smooth taxi towards the terminal.
Overall, this landing score shows a solid performance with areas for improvement. By focusing on refining the landing flare, touchdown point and alignment during future landings, you can continue to enhance your skills and strive for even better scores. Keep up the hard work and remember to practice good habits to achieve smoother and more accurate landings. You're well on your way to mastering the art of aircraft landings!
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values