Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Configure earlier
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 15 stages, 13 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway. They are the approach's score: the checks passed out of the checks that ran.
At the 1,000 ft gate: no landing flap set.
At the 500 ft gate: no landing flap set.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,498 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 340 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The Cessna C172 departed runway 32 at SBPJ Brigadeiro Lysias Rodrigues Airport, taking off in a distance of 507 meters, which represented 20% of the available runway length. The aircraft lifted off at a speed of 68 knots, and with a local temperature of 16°C and a negligible headwind, it began its enroute climb. As it transitioned from the initial climb phase to the enroute level cruise, the aircraft climbed from 1,283 feet above sea level to 3,594 feet, an increase of 2,310 feet in just 3 minutes, covering a distance of 6 nautical miles.
The enroute level cruise phase lasted for 24 minutes, during which the aircraft covered a distance of 43 nautical miles. As the aircraft approached its destination, it began its descent, initially from 3,998 feet to 3,505 feet, a decrease of 493 feet in 2 minutes, covering 3 nautical miles. The aircraft then leveled off for a brief period before resuming its descent, this time from 3,334 feet to 2,161 feet, a decrease of 1,173 feet in 2 minutes, covering 4 nautical miles. The final approach to runway 32 at SBPJ Brigadeiro Lysias Rodrigues Airport was initiated from the south east, with the aircraft maintaining a heading of 305.0° at 4 nautical miles and 1,402 feet above ground level.
The Cessna C172 landed on runway 32, with a touchdown distance of 337 meters, which was considered good. However, the touchdown speed of 61 knots was slightly higher than the recommended threshold speed. The touchdown rate of -62 feet per minute was excellent, and the runway touchdown alignment was perfect. The total landing distance was 808 meters, representing 32% of the available runway length. The runway rollout alignment was slightly misaligned by 11.2 meters from the centerline. The total flight distance was 63 nautical miles, taking 38 minutes, and the aircraft used 16 kilograms of fuel.
The Cessna C172 touched down on runway 32 at SBPJ Brigadeiro Lysias Rodrigues Airport with a satisfactory approach quality, maintaining a steady heading of 305.0° from a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,402 feet above ground level. The aircraft's descent was well-controlled, allowing for a good threshold height. However, the threshold speed was slightly above the recommended value at 75 kt, indicating a need for adjustment in the approach configuration.
Upon touchdown, the aircraft exhibited a touchdown distance of 337 meters, which was within acceptable limits. The touchdown speed of 61 kt was a bit fast, but the touchdown rate of -62 fpm was excellent, demonstrating a smooth and controlled impact. The runway touchdown alignment was perfect, with the aircraft centered on the runway. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 15°C and a negligible wind of 1 kt from 269°, contributed to a relatively straightforward landing.
The total landing distance of 808 meters, accounting for 32% of the runway length, was within acceptable limits. However, the runway rollout alignment was slightly misaligned by 11.2 meters from the centreline, indicating a need for adjustment in the post-landing configuration. Despite this minor deviation, the overall landing performance earned a score of 92.0%, reflecting a high level of proficiency in the landing phase.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values