Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Smooth the climb
A good takeoff has a defined shape. It also has a defined end. For an airliner that's thrust reduction and acceleration, commonly somewhere around 1,000 to 1,500 ft above the airfield depending on the operator, while for a light aircraft it's established at Vy with the flaps on schedule. Most simmers have no defined end to their takeoff, which is exactly why it never gets judged.
Read more in Improve Your Take-OffsStart to finish · 20 stages, 18 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Two stabilised approach gates, each with five checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
At the 1,000 ft gate: sink rate above what the glideslope needed.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,764 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,764 m of the 3,184 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 419 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Departing from KIAH George Bush Intercontinental Houston Airport, the Airbus A321 initiated its departure roll on runway 09, utilizing 53% of the available runway length to achieve a takeoff distance of 1,617 meters. The aircraft lifted off at a speed of 157 knots, taking advantage of a 10-knot headwind and a 4-knot crosswind. Local weather conditions at the time of departure featured a temperature of 25°C and a wind direction of 109° at 11 knots.
As the aircraft transitioned into the enroute climb phase, it began to ascend from 1,014 feet above sea level to 32,610 feet, a vertical increase of 31,595 feet, in 24 minutes and covering 161 nautical miles. The climb phase was followed by a level cruise, which lasted for 237 minutes and spanned 287 nautical miles. The aircraft then initiated a second climb phase, reaching an altitude of 35,000 feet in just 3 minutes and covering 63 nautical miles. The subsequent level cruise phase lasted for 1,429 minutes and covered 1,568 nautical miles. As the aircraft approached its destination, it began its descent from 35,000 feet to 1,301 feet above sea level, a vertical decrease of 33,698 feet, in 30 minutes and covering 196 nautical miles.
The Airbus A321 initiated its final approach to runway 10 at TTPP Piarco International Airport from the west, aligning with the runway at 4 nautical miles and 1,241 feet above ground level. The aircraft landed on the runway, utilizing 53% of the available length, with a touchdown distance of 422 meters. The touchdown speed was slightly above the target at 151 knots, while the touchdown rate was firm at -385 feet per minute. The aircraft then taxied to the parking area, taking 5 minutes to cover 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 2,283 nautical miles, taking 183 minutes to complete, and the aircraft utilized 10,794 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The aircraft touched down on runway 10 at TTPP Piarco International Airport with a good threshold height, indicating a well-executed approach. The threshold speed of 151 kt was slightly above the target, but still within acceptable limits. The touchdown distance of 422 m was satisfactory, demonstrating a controlled descent. However, the touchdown speed of 144 kt was a little fast, which may have contributed to the firm touchdown rate of -385 fpm.
The runway touchdown alignment was very good, with the aircraft centered on the runway. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 31 °C and wind at 11 kt from 140 °, resulted in a crosswind of 9 kt and a headwind of 7 kt. The aircraft's performance was not significantly affected by these conditions. The total landing distance of 1,691 m, which accounted for 53% of the runway length, was within acceptable limits.
The rollout phase was generally smooth, but the aircraft was slightly misaligned from the centreline by 13.9 m. This minor deviation may have been due to the firm touchdown or the aircraft's response to the crosswind. Overall, the landing was considered satisfactory, with a score of 93.6%. The crew's performance and the aircraft's handling characteristics were adequate, but there was room for improvement in terms of touchdown speed and rollout alignment.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values