Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Slow down before tight turns
Twenty knots on a monitor produces the visual sensation of about ten. The advice to "taxi at a walking pace" cannot fix this, because your sense of walking pace is exactly the thing that's broken. Put the groundspeed readout in your scan and obey it for the next fifty flights, the way a student pilot leans on the airspeed indicator before learning to read attitude.
Read more in How to Taxi AnywhereStart to finish · 19 stages, 17 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,782 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,782 m of the 3,043 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 644 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, the aircraft landing score of 85.9% is a respectable result, indicating a successful landing despite some areas for improvement.
Starting with the Approach Phase, it is evident that the descent path was slightly above the glideslope limit and the speed was slightly above target. While these aspects could be fine-tuned for more precise approach, the fact that the landing score was still relatively high suggests that the pilot managed to make adjustments and ensure a safe landing.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, it is commendable that the threshold height and landing flare were both deemed very good. However, the poor bank angle stability during landing is an area that could be worked on to achieve more consistent and stable landings in the future. With practice and attention to detail, this aspect can certainly be improved upon.
In the Touchdown Phase, the good touchdown rate and slightly above target speed indicate a successful touchdown, despite the touchdown point being slightly beyond the designated zone and the runway touchdown position deviating from the centerline. These minor discrepancies can be addressed with more practice and focus on precision during landing.
Overall, while there are areas that could be improved upon, it is important to acknowledge the positive aspects of the landing performance. With continued practice, attention to detail, and a focus on improving weak areas, the landing score can undoubtedly be further improved in future flights. Keep up the good work and strive for excellence in every landing attempt.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values