Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Use smaller, smoother aileron inputs to hold the climb bank angle near wings-level.
What happened: During Climb 3 the bank angle averaged 1.9°, well beyond a steady wings-level climb.
Watch for: Attitude indicator - bank angle, keeping it close to wings-level through the climb.
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 18 stages, 16 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
At the 1,000 ft gate: speed above the reference speed.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 3,353 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 122 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking area to the runway, which took 6 minutes and covered a distance of 2 nautical miles. The aircraft, a Boeing 737-600, then departed from runway 27R at London Heathrow Airport (EGLL). The takeoff distance was 915 meters, which is 25% of the runway length. The liftoff speed was 145 knots.
As the aircraft took off, it encountered local weather conditions with a temperature of 14°C and winds of 5 knots at 229°. The crosswind was 3 knots, while the headwind was 4 knots. After departing from London Heathrow, the aircraft began its enroute climb, which started overhead Harmondsworth in Greater London, England. The climb took 33 minutes and covered a distance of 255 nautical miles, with the aircraft ascending from 1,149 feet above sea level to 38,064 feet above sea level, an increase of 36,916 feet.
Following the enroute climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase, which started 2 miles north-east of Tarchamps in Wiltz, Luxembourg. This phase lasted for 129 minutes and covered a distance of 1,224 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its enroute descent, which started 5 miles south-east of Zafer Airport Altıntaş in Kütahya, Turkey. The descent took 21 minutes and covered a distance of 129 nautical miles, with the aircraft descending from 39,126 feet above sea level to 4,660 feet above sea level, a decrease of 34,466 feet.
The final approach to runway 01L at Konya Airport (LTAN) was made from the south, with the aircraft heading 17.0° at 4 nautical miles and 1,267 feet above ground level. The landing was made on runway 01L, which has a length of 3,353 meters. The threshold height was good, and the threshold speed was 124 knots. The touchdown distance was also good at 124 meters, with the touchdown speed being 121 knots. However, the touchdown rate was fair at -298 feet per minute.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were a temperature of 13°C and winds of 2 knots at 189°, with a crosswind of 0 knots and a tailwind of 2 knots. The total landing distance was 651 meters, which is 19% of the runway length. The runway rollout alignment was perfect, and the taxiing period from the runway to the parking area took less than 1 minute, covering a distance of less than 1 nautical mile.
In total, the flight covered a distance of 1,616 nautical miles and took 191 minutes to complete, using 8,656 kilograms of fuel.
The Boeing 737-600 aircraft successfully landed at LTAN Konya Airport, achieving a high score of 99.2%. The final approach to runway 01L was conducted from the south, with a heading of 17.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,267 feet above ground level (agl).
The aircraft touched down on the runway with a good threshold height, indicating a precise and controlled descent. The threshold speed of 124 knots was also within the acceptable range, demonstrating the pilot's ability to manage the aircraft's speed during the landing phase. The touchdown distance of 124 meters was also satisfactory, indicating a smooth and controlled touchdown.
However, the touchdown rate of -298 feet per minute (fpm) was only fair, suggesting that the aircraft may have touched down slightly harder than desired. Nevertheless, the runway touchdown alignment was very good, indicating that the aircraft was properly aligned with the runway centerline at the moment of touchdown.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were favorable, with a temperature of 13°C and a wind speed of 2 knots from 189°. The crosswind component was negligible, and the tailwind component was minimal at 2 knots. These conditions likely contributed to the smooth and controlled nature of the landing.
The total landing distance of 651 meters was only 19% of the runway length, indicating a short and efficient landing. The runway rollout alignment was perfect, suggesting that the aircraft was properly aligned with the runway centerline during the rollout phase. Overall, the landing was a success, with the aircraft touching down smoothly and coming to a stop in a controlled manner.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values