Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Configure earlier
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 20 stages, 18 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Two stabilised approach gates, each with six checks at 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,526 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,526 m of the 2,998 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 769 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Departing from Heydar Aliyev International Airport, the aircraft began its taxiing process from the parking area to the runway, taking approximately 15 minutes to cover a distance of 3 nautical miles. Upon reaching runway 17, the departure roll commenced, and the aircraft accelerated down the 1,758-meter runway, utilizing 54% of its length to achieve liftoff at a speed of 127 knots. The local weather conditions at the time of departure featured a temperature of 5°C, with a 10-knot wind blowing at 140°, resulting in a 7-knot crosswind and an 8-knot headwind.
As the aircraft climbed away from the airport, it began its enroute climb 1 mile west of Biny Selo, Azerbaijan, rising from 997 feet above sea level to 19,011 feet in just 6 minutes, covering a distance of 23 nautical miles. The climb was characterized by a significant increase in altitude, with the aircraft ascending by 18,014 feet. The enroute level cruise phase started overhead Lokbatan, lasting 2 minutes and covering 10 nautical miles. The aircraft then initiated another climb 2 miles north of Khirdalan, reaching an altitude of 38,010 feet in 9 minutes, covering 38 nautical miles. Following this, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase 6 miles northeast of Qobustan, lasting 14 minutes and covering 93 nautical miles. As the aircraft approached its destination, it began its descent 4 miles north of Mingelchaur, Azerbaijan, descending from 37,347 feet to 2,843 feet in 22 minutes, covering 110 nautical miles.
As the aircraft entered the final approach phase, it aligned with runway 31L at Tbilisi International Airport, heading 316.0° at 4 nautical miles and 1,226 feet above ground level. The landing was executed with a threshold speed slightly above the target at 114 knots, and the touchdown point was 390 meters beyond the touchdown zone. The touchdown speed of 90 knots was within the acceptable range, and the touchdown rate of -2 feet per minute was perfect. The runway touchdown alignment was also very good. Following the landing, the aircraft taxied to the parking area, taking approximately 4 minutes to cover a distance of less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 284 nautical miles, with a flight time of 67 minutes and a fuel consumption of 423 kilograms.
The final approach to runway 31L at UGTB Tbilisi International Airport from the south east was executed with precision, with the aircraft heading 316.0° at 4 nm and 1,226 ft above ground level. The approach quality was excellent, with a good threshold height and a slight deviation in threshold speed, reaching 114 kt, which was marginally above the target.
Upon touchdown, the aircraft touched down 390 m beyond the touchdown zone, with a speed of 90 kt, which was within the acceptable range. The touchdown rate of -2 fpm was perfect, indicating a smooth and controlled descent. The runway touchdown alignment was very good, with the aircraft maintaining its centerline alignment throughout the landing. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 3 °C and a wind speed of 1 kt at 269°, contributed to a relatively calm and stable environment.
The total landing distance of 1,483 m, which accounted for 49% of the runway length, was within the acceptable range. The runway rollout alignment was perfect, with the aircraft maintaining its centerline alignment throughout the rollout phase. Overall, the landing was executed with high precision and control, resulting in a score of 95.5%.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values