Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Improve the rollout
Ground control varies with speed, full authority at walking pace, progressively reducing as groundspeed rises. The aircraft becomes twitchy at any speed, every small pedal input swings the nose, which can encourage large-amplitude leg inputs that no real aircraft would accept.
Read more in How to Taxi AnywhereStart to finish · 18 stages, 16 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 7,917 ft of the approach.
Plan view — the first 7,917 ft of the 12,075 ft runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 1,883 ft past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took 11 minutes and covered a distance of 2 nautical miles. The aircraft, a Boeing 737-600, then departed from runway 25 at UNOO Omsk Central Airport. The takeoff distance was 2,833 feet, which was 35% of the runway length. The liftoff speed was 146 knots, and the local weather conditions at the time of departure were a temperature of 64°F, with a wind speed of 3 knots at 249°.
As the aircraft climbed away from the airport, it began its enroute climb, which started overhead UNOO Omsk Central Airport. The climb took 15 minutes and covered a distance of 94 nautical miles, during which the aircraft ascended from 1,333 feet above sea level to 36,614 feet above sea level, an increase of 35,281 feet. The enroute level cruise then began 15 miles south of Tatarsk, and lasted for 9 minutes, covering a distance of 72 nautical miles.
The enroute descent started 22 miles northwest of Zdvinsk, and took 28 minutes to complete, covering a distance of 151 nautical miles. During this time, the aircraft descended from 36,660 feet above sea level to 1,669 feet above sea level, a decrease of 34,991 feet. The final approach to runway 16 at UNNT Novosibirsk Tolmachevo Airport was made from the north, with a heading of 170.0°, and the aircraft was at an altitude of 4 nautical miles and 1,281 feet above ground level.
The landing on runway 16 was successful, with a touchdown point 500 feet beyond the touchdown zone. The touchdown speed was 118 knots, which was good, but the touchdown rate was fair at -204 feet per minute. The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 14 feet from the centreline, and the runway rollout alignment was also slightly misaligned by 34 feet from the centreline. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were a temperature of 66°F, with a wind speed of 4 knots at 140°.
The total landing distance was 7,634 feet, which was 63% of the runway length. The taxiing period from the runway to the parking took 18 minutes and covered a distance of 3 nautical miles. The total flight distance was 328 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 79 minutes. The aircraft used 5,959 pounds of fuel during the flight.
The Boeing 737-600 aircraft successfully landed at UNNT Novosibirsk Tolmachevo Airport, achieving a score of 94.4%. The final approach to runway 16 was initiated from the north, with a heading of 170.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,281 feet above ground level (agl). The aircraft's approach was characterized by a good threshold speed of 125 knots, which is within the acceptable range for a safe landing.
Upon touchdown, the aircraft landed 500 feet beyond the designated touchdown zone, with a speed of 118 knots, which is also within the acceptable range. However, the touchdown rate of -204 feet per minute (fpm) was considered fair, indicating that the aircraft could have been brought down to the ground more smoothly. The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 14 feet from the centreline, which may have been due to a slight deviation in the aircraft's approach path.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were favorable, with a temperature of 66°F and a wind speed of 4 knots at 140°. The crosswind component was minimal at 2 knots, while the headwind component was 3 knots, which helped to stabilize the aircraft's approach. The total landing distance of 7,634 feet was 63% of the runway length, indicating that the aircraft had sufficient runway remaining for a safe stop.
During the rollout phase, the aircraft's alignment was slightly misaligned by 34 feet from the centreline, which may have been due to a slight deviation in the aircraft's braking or steering. Overall, the landing was considered safe and successful, with the aircraft achieving a high score of 94.4%. However, there is room for improvement in terms of touchdown rate and runway alignment during the rollout phase.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values