Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Make small rudder corrections against a point at the far end to hold the centreline.
What happened: During the ground roll you drifted 9.1 m off the runway centreline.
Watch for: Watch runway alignment against the centreline, correcting with small rudder inputs.
See Departure Roll
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 15 stages, 14 in the score
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate for a circuit: seven checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate is an instrument-approach check and does not apply.
At the 1,000 ft gate: speed above the reference speed.
At the 500 ft gate: speed above the reference speed.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 3,602 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 617 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a departure roll from runway 16 at Vienna International Airport (LOWW). The aircraft, an Airbus A320, accelerated down the runway and lifted off at a speed of 138 knots. The takeoff distance was 72 meters, which is just 2% of the runway length.
As the aircraft entered the local airspace, it encountered a temperature of 1 degree Celsius and a wind speed of 6 knots from a direction of 9 degrees. The crosswind component was 3 knots, while the tailwind component was 5 knots. The pilot navigated the aircraft through a right-hand pattern entry from runway 16, completing the maneuver in less than 1 nautical mile in 104 seconds.
The aircraft then proceeded to the downwind leg, where it turned to a heading of 345.0 degrees and descended to an altitude of 957 feet above ground level (agl). The distance covered during the downwind turn was 5 nautical miles, with an angle to the runway of 45 degrees and a turn radius of 2.2 degrees.
As the aircraft approached the runway, it began its final approach from the south. The pilot maintained a steady heading and descended to a height of 957 feet agl, before touching down on runway 34. The touchdown point was 202 meters beyond the touchdown zone, and the touchdown speed was 141 knots, which was slightly faster than the target speed.
The landing distance was 1,305 meters, which is 36% of the runway length. The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned from the centerline by 7.7 meters. The pilot maintained control of the aircraft during the rollout, but the runway rollout alignment was also slightly misaligned from the centerline by 7.8 meters.
The total flight distance was 7 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 4 minutes. The aircraft used 172 kilograms of fuel during the flight. Overall, the flight was completed successfully, with the pilot demonstrating good control and navigation skills throughout the flight.
The Airbus A320 successfully landed at Vienna International Airport (LOWW) on runway 34, achieving a score of 94.1%. The aircraft was approaching the runway from the south, heading 345.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 957 feet above ground level (agl). The landing was executed on a runway with a length of 3,602 meters.
The threshold height was reported as good, indicating that the aircraft was at the correct height as it approached the runway. However, the threshold speed was above the target speed, coming in at 153 knots. This may have been due to the aircraft's approach configuration or the pilot's decision to prioritize a safe landing over a precise touchdown speed.
The touchdown point was 202 meters beyond the designated touchdown zone, which may have been due to the aircraft's speed at touchdown. The touchdown speed of 141 knots was faster than the target speed, which could have contributed to the extended touchdown point. On the positive side, the touchdown rate was excellent, with a rate of -66 feet per minute (fpm).
The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned from the centerline, with an offset of 7.7 meters. This may have been due to the crosswind or headwind conditions, which were reported as 3 knots and 5 knots, respectively. The local weather conditions were also taken into account, with a temperature of 1°C and a wind direction of 9°.
The total landing distance was 1,305 meters, which is 36% of the runway length. This is a relatively short landing distance, indicating that the aircraft was able to touch down and stop within a reasonable distance. However, the runway rollout alignment was also slightly misaligned from the centerline, with an offset of 7.8 meters. This may have been due to the same factors that contributed to the initial touchdown position offset.
Overall, the landing was successful, but there were some areas for improvement. The aircraft's speed at touchdown and the initial touchdown position offset were the main concerns. However, the excellent touchdown rate and short landing distance were positive aspects of the landing.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values