Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Improve the takeoff
The rudder input is a changing profile through the roll rather than one that is held. So the demand on your right foot starts large at power application, eases as speed builds and the rudder gains authority, then jumps again at rotation.
Read more in Improve Your Take-OffsStart to finish · 14 stages, 13 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,606 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 367 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a departure roll from runway 06 at SBCG Campo Grande Airport. The Airbus A320 took off with a takeoff distance of 779 meters, which is 30% of the runway length. The liftoff speed was 145 knots, and the local weather conditions at the time of takeoff were a temperature of 30 degrees Celsius, with a wind speed of 8 knots at 80 degrees. The crosswind component was 5 knots, and the headwind component was 7 knots.
As the aircraft climbed away from the airport, it began its enroute climb, which started overhead SBCG Campo Grande Airport. The aircraft climbed from an altitude of 2,962 feet above sea level to 3,557 feet above sea level, an increase of 595 feet, in less than 1 minute and covering less than 1 nautical mile. This rapid climb was a testament to the aircraft's performance capabilities.
Following the enroute climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase, which lasted for 2 minutes and covered a distance of 4 nautical miles. This phase allowed the aircraft to maintain a steady altitude and speed, conserving fuel and reducing the workload on the pilots.
As the aircraft approached its destination, it began its enroute descent, which started 3 miles west of SBCG Campo Grande Airport. The aircraft descended from an altitude of 3,842 feet above sea level to 2,428 feet above sea level, a decrease of 1,414 feet, in 2 minutes and covering 2 nautical miles. This controlled descent ensured a smooth and safe arrival at the airport.
The final approach to runway 06 at SBCG Campo Grande Airport was made from the southwest, with a heading of 45.0 degrees at 2 nautical miles and 583 feet above ground level. The aircraft landed on the runway, which had a length of 2,606 meters. The threshold height was good, and the threshold speed was also good at 117 knots.
The touchdown distance was good at 354 meters, and the touchdown speed was 109 knots, which was also good. However, the touchdown rate was fair at -204 feet per minute. The runway touchdown alignment was very good, indicating a precise and controlled landing.
Following the landing, the aircraft taxied to the parking area from the runway, taking 3 minutes and covering less than 1 nautical mile. The total landing distance was 1,041 meters, which is 40% of the runway length. The runway rollout alignment was also very good, indicating a smooth and controlled deceleration.
The total flight distance was 10 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 8 minutes. The aircraft used 251 kilograms of fuel during the flight. Overall, the flight was a successful and efficient operation, with good weather conditions and precise control throughout the flight phases.
The Airbus A320 successfully landed at SBCG Campo Grande Airport, achieving a high score of 99.1%. The aircraft approached the runway from the southwest, heading 45.0° at an altitude of 583 feet above ground level (agl) and 2 nautical miles from the runway. This approach angle and distance allowed the pilots to maintain a safe and controlled descent.
Upon landing, the aircraft touched down on runway 06, which has a length of 2,606 meters. The threshold height was good, indicating that the aircraft was at the correct height as it approached the runway. The threshold speed of 117 knots was also within the acceptable range, demonstrating the pilots' ability to manage the aircraft's speed during the landing.
The touchdown distance of 354 meters was good, indicating that the aircraft was able to slow down quickly and smoothly after touching down. The touchdown speed of 109 knots was also within the acceptable range, further demonstrating the pilots' skill in managing the aircraft's speed. However, the touchdown rate of -204 feet per minute (fpm) was only fair, suggesting that the aircraft may have experienced a slightly higher-than-desired rate of descent during the landing.
Despite this, the runway touchdown alignment was very good, indicating that the aircraft was aligned with the runway centerline as it touched down. This is an important factor in ensuring a safe and controlled landing. The local weather conditions at the time of the landing were also favorable, with a temperature of 28°C and winds of 8 knots at 80°. The crosswind component was 5 knots, while the headwind component was 6 knots, which is relatively light and should not have presented a significant challenge to the pilots.
The total landing distance of 1,041 meters was 40% of the runway length, which is a relatively short distance. This suggests that the pilots were able to slow down the aircraft quickly and smoothly after touchdown, and that the aircraft was able to stop within a safe distance from the end of the runway. The runway rollout alignment was also very good, indicating that the aircraft was aligned with the runway centerline as it rolled out after touchdown.
Overall, the landing was a success, with the pilots demonstrating a high level of skill and control throughout the approach and landing.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values