Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Raise the gear lever promptly once a positive climb is confirmed, before reaching the target retraction height.
What happened: Gear retraction was delayed, with the gear not coming up until 0 ft agl.
Watch for: Landing gear: up by the normal retraction gate
Arrival
Smooth out your control inputs through touchdown and rollout, easing the controls rather than snapping them to avoid sharp g spikes.
What happened: Average g force through the landing came out at 1 g, well above the smooth, steady loading expected through touchdown and rollout.
Watch for: G-force meter: hold it within the normal smooth range through touchdown and rollout.
See Arrival Landing
Make sure that you retract the landing gear once you have a positive rate of climb and there is no usable runway left to land back on.
Read more in Improve Your Take-OffsStart to finish · 16 stages, 15 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway. They are the approach's score: the checks passed out of the checks that ran.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 5,000 ft of the approach.
Plan view — the first 5,000 ft of the 13,436 ft runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 942 ft touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Departing from KBZN Bozeman Yellowstone International Airport, the Boeing B737-800 began its journey on runway 30, taking off with a distance of 5,396 feet, which covered 60% of the runway. The aircraft lifted off at a speed of 149 knots, with a local temperature of 61°F and a gentle headwind of 3 knots from a direction of 310°.
As the aircraft climbed out of the departure airport, it began its enroute climb 1 mile north of Belgrade, Montana, reaching an altitude of 37,018 feet above sea level in 17 minutes, covering a distance of 112 nautical miles. The climb was a significant increase of 31,607 feet from the initial altitude of 5,411 feet. The aircraft then entered a level cruise phase, lasting 105 minutes and covering 794 nautical miles, before starting its descent 6 miles east of Vernon, Texas. The descent from 36,524 feet to 3,022 feet took 21 minutes and covered 118 nautical miles. The aircraft then entered a brief level cruise phase, lasting 3 minutes and covering 7 nautical miles, before starting its final descent 1 mile north east of Lewisville, Texas.
The Boeing B737-800 began its final approach to runway 18R at KDFW Dallas Fort Worth International Airport from the north, heading 180.0° at 4 nautical miles and 1,268 feet above ground level. The aircraft landed on the runway with a touchdown distance of 917 feet, which was 20% of the runway length. The touchdown speed was 131 knots, and the touchdown rate was -158 feet per minute, indicating a good landing. The runway touchdown alignment was perfect, and the runway rollout alignment was very good. After landing, the aircraft taxied to the parking area, taking 11 minutes and covering 2 nautical miles. The total flight distance was 1,044 nautical miles, taking 169 minutes, and the aircraft used 14,028 pounds of fuel during the flight.
The Boeing B737-800 touched down on runway 18R at KDFW Dallas Fort Worth International Airport with a high degree of precision, achieving a score of 99.6%. The aircraft's approach to the runway from the north, heading 180.0° at 4 nm and 1,268 ft above ground level, was characterized by good quality, setting the stage for a smooth landing. The threshold height was well managed, and the threshold speed of 137 kt was achieved, indicating a well-executed approach.
As the aircraft made contact with the runway, the touchdown characteristics were equally impressive. The touchdown distance of 917 ft was within acceptable limits, and the touchdown speed of 131 kt was well within the target range. The touchdown rate of -158 fpm was also good, demonstrating a high degree of control and precision. The runway touchdown alignment was perfect, with the aircraft centered on the runway's centerline. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 86°F and a 9 kt headwind, presented a moderate challenge, but the crew's skills and the aircraft's performance capabilities were more than adequate to handle the conditions.
The rollout phase was equally impressive, with the aircraft maintaining very good alignment on the runway centerline. The total landing distance of 2,710 ft, which accounted for only 20% of the runway's length, was a testament to the crew's skill and the aircraft's performance. Overall, the landing was a credit to the crew's professionalism and the aircraft's capabilities, with a score of 99.6% reflecting the high level of precision and control demonstrated throughout the approach, touchdown, and rollout phases.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values