Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Smooth the climb
A good takeoff has a defined shape. It also has a defined end. For an airliner that's thrust reduction and acceleration, commonly somewhere around 1,000 to 1,500 ft above the airfield depending on the operator, while for a light aircraft it's established at Vy with the flaps on schedule. Most simmers have no defined end to their takeoff, which is exactly why it never gets judged.
Read more in Improve Your Take-OffsStart to finish · 28 stages, 27 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,199 m of the approach.
Plan view — the full 1,199 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 251 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, this aircraft landing exhibited a mix of both strengths and weaknesses throughout each phase of the landing.
In the Approach Phase, there was room for improvement in the descent path above the glideslope limit. However, the heading alignment was good and the speed was well above target, which indicates a strong ability to maintain control and make adjustments as needed.
During the Landing Phase, there were positive aspects such as a good threshold height and a very good landing flare. However, there were areas that could be refined, such as the poor landing heading and bank angle stability. These are key elements for a smooth and controlled landing, but with practice and focus, these aspects can be improved upon.
Moving on to the Touchdown Phase, there was a firm touchdown rate and the speed was above target. However, the touchdown distance inside the touchdown zone and the runway touchdown position were very good, indicating a successful and precise touchdown despite the initial challenges faced during the Approach and Landing Phases.
Finally, in the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment was slightly off at 7.2 meters from the centerline. This could be adjusted with more attention to detail and precision during the final stages of landing.
In conclusion, while there were areas for improvement throughout each phase of the landing, it is important to acknowledge the strengths displayed, such as maintaining good speed control and executing a precise touchdown. With continued practice, attention to detail, and a focus on refining techniques, this pilot has the potential to achieve even smoother and more controlled landings in the future. Keep up the hard work and dedication to mastering the art of landing!
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values