Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Start to finish · 20 stages, 18 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,603 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,603 m of the 2,847 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 436 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took 7 minutes and covered a distance of 1 nautical mile. The aircraft, a Boeing 737-800, then departed from runway 30 at LEBB Bilbao Airport. The takeoff distance was 1,274 meters, which is 60% of the runway length. The liftoff speed was 151 knots.
The local weather conditions at the time of departure were a temperature of 16 degrees Celsius, with a wind speed of 8 knots at 279 degrees. This resulted in a crosswind of 2 knots and a headwind of 8 knots. The aircraft then began its enroute climb, starting 1 mile east of Erandio, Spain, and climbing from an altitude of 1,158 feet above sea level to 35,679 feet above sea level, an increase of 34,522 feet in 16 minutes, covering a distance of 68 nautical miles.
After reaching the cruising altitude, the aircraft entered a level cruise, starting 4 miles west of Seignosse, France, and lasting 63 minutes, covering a distance of 460 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its enroute descent, starting overhead Wattrelos, France, and descending from 35,480 feet above sea level to 1,934 feet above sea level, a decrease of 33,546 feet in 23 minutes, covering a distance of 99 nautical miles.
The aircraft then entered another level cruise, starting 1 mile northeast of Boskoop, the Netherlands, and lasting 2 minutes, covering a distance of 4 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its final descent, starting 1 mile south of Papenveer, the Netherlands, and descending from 1,930 feet above sea level to 1,267 feet above sea level, a decrease of 663 feet in 2 minutes, covering a distance of 5 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 36C at EHAM Amsterdam Airport Schiphol was made from the south, heading 3.0 degrees at 4 nautical miles and 1,266 feet above ground level. The landing was made on runway 36C, which has a length of 2,847 meters. The threshold height was good, and the threshold speed was also good at 137 knots. The touchdown distance was good at 438 meters, but the touchdown speed was a little fast at 129 knots. The touchdown rate was good at -183 feet per minute, and the runway touchdown alignment was very good.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were a temperature of 9 degrees Celsius, with a wind speed of 9 knots at 60 degrees. This resulted in a crosswind of 7 knots and a headwind of 5 knots. The total landing distance was 1,522 meters, which is 53% of the runway length. The runway rollout alignment was also very good.
The taxiing period from the runway to the parking took 12 minutes and covered a distance of 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 644 nautical miles, taking 126 minutes, and the aircraft used 4,719 kilograms of fuel.
The Boeing 737-800 aircraft successfully landed at EHAM Amsterdam Airport Schiphol, demonstrating a high level of precision and control. The final approach to runway 36C was executed from the south, with a heading of 3.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,266 feet above ground level (agl). This approach was characterized by a high score of 99.7%, indicating a nearly flawless execution of the landing procedure.
Upon landing, the aircraft touched down on the runway with a good threshold height, which is a critical factor in ensuring a safe and controlled touchdown. The threshold speed of 137 knots was also within the acceptable range, indicating that the pilot had maintained a suitable airspeed during the approach. The touchdown distance of 438 meters was also good, demonstrating that the pilot had managed to slow the aircraft down effectively before touchdown.
However, the touchdown speed of 129 knots was slightly faster than desired, which may have resulted in a slightly higher rate of descent. Nevertheless, the touchdown rate of -183 feet per minute (fpm) was still within the acceptable range, indicating that the pilot had maintained control of the aircraft during the descent. The runway touchdown alignment was also very good, which is essential for ensuring a safe and controlled landing.
The local weather conditions at the time of the landing were characterized by a temperature of 9°C and a wind speed of 9 knots from a direction of 60°. This resulted in a crosswind component of 7 knots and a headwind component of 5 knots. Despite these wind conditions, the pilot was able to maintain a high level of control and precision during the landing, resulting in a total landing distance of 1,522 meters, which is equivalent to 53% of the runway length.
The runway rollout alignment was also very good, indicating that the pilot had maintained control of the aircraft during the rollout phase and had brought the aircraft to a safe stop. Overall, this landing was characterized by a high level of precision and control, and the pilot's skills and experience were evident throughout the approach and landing phases.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values