Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Shorten the long landing
Ground effect becomes significant below about one wingspan of height. A Cessna 172, with a 36 ft span, enters ground effect at flare height - the float it feels in the hold-off is ground effect arriving on cue. An A320, with a span around 117 ft, has been in ground effect since before the threshold and there is no sudden cushion to feel, only a gradual reduction in induced drag that lengthens any float you allow.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 21 stages, 19 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 2,375 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 2,375 m of the 3,195 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 1,987 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, the aircraft landing score of 80.9% indicates a decent performance, but there are areas that can be improved upon to achieve a higher score in future landings.
Starting with the Approach Phase, it is concerning that the descent path was above the glideslope limit. This can lead to difficulties in achieving a smooth and controlled descent towards the runway. It is important to closely monitor the descent path and make adjustments as necessary to stay within the glideslope limit.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, it is noted that the threshold height was excessively over the target and the landing flare was very poor. These factors can impact the smoothness of the landing and the overall control of the aircraft during touchdown. It is important to focus on maintaining proper altitude and executing a well-timed and controlled flare to achieve a smoother touchdown.
In the Touchdown Phase, while the touchdown rate was smooth, the speed was slightly above the target and the touchdown point was very long, using more than 50% of the available runway. Additionally, the runway touchdown position was 2.6m from the centerline. Improving speed control and aiming for a shorter touchdown point can help optimize runway usage and ensure a more precise landing.
On a positive note, the Rollout Phase showed very good runway alignment, indicating good control of the aircraft during the rollout process. This is a crucial aspect of the landing phase and demonstrates good situational awareness and piloting skills.
In conclusion, while the aircraft landing score of 80.9% is a solid performance, there are specific areas that can be targeted for improvement in order to achieve a higher score in future landings. By focusing on maintaining proper descent path, flare execution, speed control, and touchdown precision, you can enhance the overall quality of your landings and strive for even greater success in all phases of the landing process. Keep up the good work and continue to strive for excellence in your flying skills.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values