Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Maintain the centreline
A small uncorrected heading error at 40 knots becomes a metre of offset per second by 100 knots, noticed only at rotation, producing a crabbed liftoff. Root cause is nearly always eyes on the tape instead of the far end of the runway. Small heading changes displace a distant point visibly long before the nearby centreline stripes look wrong.
Read more in Improve Your Take-OffsStart to finish · 22 stages, 21 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,755 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,755 m of the 3,666 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 676 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, a score of 91.1% for the aircraft landing is quite impressive and demonstrates strong proficiency in many areas. Let's break down the different phases of the landing to provide a more detailed analysis.
Starting with the Approach Phase, it's great to see that the glideslope alignment was good. This indicates that the pilot was able to maintain the correct angle of descent, leading to a smooth approach to the runway.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, while the threshold height was above target, it's important to note that the touchdown rate was good and the speed was on target. However, the landing flare was very poor, suggesting that there might have been room for improvement in terms of the descent just before touchdown.
In the Touchdown Phase, it's positive to see that the touchdown point was 262 meters beyond the touchdown zone. This could be an indication of a longer flare or a smooth touchdown further down the runway. Additionally, the runway touchdown position was very good, showing good control and accuracy during this critical phase of the landing.
Finally, in the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment was very good, demonstrating excellent control and precision in keeping the aircraft centered on the runway during the rollout.
Overall, while there are areas that could be improved upon, such as the landing flare and threshold height, the pilot should be commended for a solid performance in maintaining good glideslope alignment, touchdown rate, speed, touchdown position, and runway alignment. Keep up the good work and continue to strive for excellence in all phases of the landing procedure. With continued practice and attention to detail, even better scores can be achieved in the future.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values