Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Hold the approach speed
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 22 stages, 21 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,462 m of the approach.
Plan view — the full 1,462 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 237 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, the aircraft landing score of 88.0% is a solid performance, with room for improvement in certain areas.
In the Approach Phase, it is noted that the descent path was below the glideslope limit. This indicates that the aircraft may have descended too quickly, potentially leading to a harder landing. Additionally, the speed was slightly below the target, which could have impacted the overall smoothness of the landing.
However, the Landing Phase demonstrated positive aspects, with a good threshold height and very good landing flare. These elements contribute to a controlled and smooth touchdown, indicating good pilot technique in this phase of the landing.
Moving on to the Touchdown Phase, while the touchdown rate was fair, it is important to continue working on achieving smoother landings in order to reduce wear and tear on the aircraft. The fact that the speed was on target and the touchdown distance was inside the touchdown zone are both positive indicators of a well-executed touchdown. Additionally, the runway touchdown position being very good is a testament to the pilot's accuracy and precision during this critical phase of the landing.
Finally, in the Rollout Phase, it is noted that the runway alignment was 10.1 meters from the centerline. Improving runway alignment can help enhance overall safety and efficiency during landing, so it is an area worth focusing on for future landings.
In conclusion, while this landing score of 88.0% is commendable, there are areas that can be further refined to achieve even better results in future landings. By continuing to work on aspects such as descent path, speed control, touchdown smoothness, and runway alignment, the overall landing performance can be further enhanced. Keep up the good work and continue striving for excellence in every phase of the landing process.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values