Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Make small rudder corrections against a point at the far end to hold the centreline.
What happened: During the ground roll you drifted 6.4 m off the runway centreline.
Watch for: Watch runway alignment against the centreline, correcting with small rudder inputs.
See Departure Roll
Arrival
Add power on short final to hold 115 kt over the threshold instead of letting speed decay.
What happened: Threshold speed was 8 kt below the 115 kt target, and the sink was arrested at 9.6 ft while already slow, so the aircraft settled as the speed ran out, producing a firm touchdown at 352 fpm.
Watch for: Airspeed indicator: 115 kt at the threshold
There are several things that can go wrong during the flare, carrying too much speed over the threshold, starting the flare at the wrong height and inconsistent flight control inputs, all contribute to a poor flare resulting in a hard touchdown or a float down the runway.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 19 stages, 17 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway. They are the approach's score: the checks passed out of the checks that ran.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,646 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,646 m of the 3,052 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 604 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Departing from Antalya International Airport, the Phenom 300E began its journey by taxiing from the parking area to the runway, a process that took 7 minutes and covered a distance of 1 nautical mile. As the aircraft rolled down runway 36R, it accelerated to a liftoff speed of 125 knots, clearing the ground at 2,031 meters, which was 60% of the runway's length. The local weather conditions at the time of departure featured a temperature of 21°C, with a gentle headwind of 6 knots and a crosswind of 4 knots.
As the aircraft climbed out of Antalya, it began its enroute climb, ascending from 1,153 feet above sea level to 27,998 feet in just 8 minutes, covering a distance of 31 nautical miles. The climb was characterized by a steady increase in altitude, with the aircraft reaching its cruising altitude in a relatively short period. The enroute level cruise phase that followed lasted for 10 minutes, during which the aircraft covered a distance of 134 nautical miles. The descent phase that began 11 miles east of Tavsanli saw the aircraft lose 17,851 feet in altitude over a period of 13 minutes, covering a distance of 103 nautical miles.
As the aircraft continued its journey, it entered another enroute level cruise phase, this time lasting 3 minutes and covering 14 nautical miles. The final descent phase began 2 miles east of Kandira, during which the aircraft lost 8,206 feet in altitude over a period of 12 minutes, covering a distance of 40 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its final approach to runway 24R at Istanbul Sabiha Gökçen International Airport, touching down at a speed of 105 knots and a distance of 81 meters. The total landing distance was 1,032 meters, which was 35% of the runway's length. The aircraft then taxied to the parking area, a process that took just 1 minute and covered a distance of less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 330 nautical miles, and the aircraft used 560 kilograms of fuel during the journey, which took a total of 54 minutes.
The final approach to runway 24R at LTFJ Istanbul Sabiha Gökçen International Airport was conducted from the north east, aligning with the heading of 244.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,482 feet above ground level. The approach quality was satisfactory, with a good threshold height achieved. However, the threshold speed was slightly above the target at 117 kt, indicating a slight deviation from the optimal landing speed.
As the aircraft touched down on the runway, the touchdown distance was good at 81 meters, and the touchdown speed of 105 kt was within the acceptable range. The touchdown rate was firm at -316 fpm, indicating a controlled descent. The runway touchdown alignment was perfect, with the aircraft centered on the runway. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 17°C and a wind of 4 kt at 220°, contributed to a relatively calm landing environment. The crosswind component was minimal at 2 kt, while the headwind component was 4 kt, providing a favorable wind condition for the landing.
The total landing distance was 1,032 meters, which accounted for 35% of the runway length. The runway rollout alignment was very good, indicating a smooth and controlled deceleration of the aircraft after touchdown. Overall, the landing performance was satisfactory, with a score of 92.5% achieved. The aircraft's Oberon interior and Phenom 300E configuration contributed to a successful landing, with the pilot's skills and experience playing a crucial role in achieving a good landing outcome.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values