Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Make small rudder corrections against a point at the far end to hold the centreline.
What happened: During the ground roll you drifted 11 m off the runway centreline.
Watch for: Watch runway alignment against the centreline, correcting with small rudder inputs.
See Departure Roll
Arrival
Begin the flare with progressive back pressure and keep it coming until the sink is arrested, rather than flying it on flat.
What happened: The nose was barely raised in the flare and little of the sink was taken out, flying the aircraft onto the runway. This pattern usually carries through to a firm touchdown with a noticeable sink rate.
Watch for: Vertical speed indicator: a smoothly reducing sink through the normal flare band, not a steady rate into the runway.
Ground control varies with speed, full authority at walking pace, progressively reducing as groundspeed rises. The aircraft becomes twitchy at any speed, every small pedal input swings the nose, which can encourage large-amplitude leg inputs that no real aircraft would accept.
Read more in How to Taxi AnywhereStart to finish · 20 stages, 18 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway. They are the approach's score: the checks passed out of the checks that ran.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 3,051 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 276 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Departing from Antalya International Airport, the Boeing 737-700 began its journey by taxiing from the parking area to the runway, a process that took 14 minutes and covered a distance of 3 nautical miles. As the aircraft lined up on runway 36R, the local weather conditions were characterized by a temperature of 14 °C, with a wind speed of 16 kt at 320 °, resulting in a crosswind of 12 kt and a headwind of 11 kt.
As the aircraft departed, it accelerated to a liftoff speed of 139 kt, achieving a takeoff distance of 1,023 meters, which was 30% of the runway length. The initial climb phase began overhead Antalya International Airport, where the aircraft ascended from 1,145 feet above sea level to 9,670 feet, an increase of 8,525 feet in just 3 minutes, covering a distance of 10 nautical miles. The flight continued with several enroute climbs and level cruises, with notable increases in altitude, including a climb from 9,989 feet to 28,008 feet in 11 minutes, covering 63 nautical miles. The aircraft also experienced several level cruises, including a 9-minute cruise at 28,008 feet, covering 59 nautical miles.
As the flight approached its destination, Istanbul Sabiha Gökçen International Airport, the aircraft began its descent, reducing its altitude from 27,999 feet to 8,008 feet in 16 minutes, covering 82 nautical miles. The final approach to runway 06L was made from the south-west, with a heading of 64.0 ° at 4 nautical miles and 1,515 feet above ground level. The aircraft landed safely on the runway, with a touchdown distance of 275 meters, slightly above the target threshold speed of 133 kt. The total landing distance was 1,349 meters, 45% of the runway length, and the aircraft taxied to the parking area in just 1 minute, covering less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 305 nautical miles, taking 72 minutes, and the aircraft used 2,696 kilograms of fuel during the journey.
The Boeing 737-700 touched down on runway 06L at LTFJ Istanbul Sabiha Gökçen International Airport with a threshold speed slightly above the target at 133 kt. The aircraft maintained a good threshold height, setting it up for a smooth touchdown. The touchdown distance of 275 m was within acceptable limits, but the touchdown speed of 127 kt was a little fast, indicating a slight loss of control during the final stages of the approach.
The touchdown rate of -279 fpm was fair, but not ideal. The runway touchdown position was misaligned by 7.9 m from the centreline, which could have been a result of the slight crosswind component of 1 kt. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 1 °C and a headwind of 4 kt, may have also played a role in the slight misalignment. The total landing distance of 1,349 m, which accounted for 45% of the runway length, was acceptable.
The rollout phase saw the aircraft maintain a slightly misaligned path, deviating from the centreline by 7.7 m. Despite this, the overall performance of the landing was good, with a final score of 96.8%. The approach quality was satisfactory, with a good threshold height and a smooth touchdown distance. However, the slight misalignment during the rollout phase prevented the landing from being perfect.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values