Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Landing lights
Before entering the runway, make sure your landing lights are on and the taxi lights switched off.
Start to finish · 20 stages, 19 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,539 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,539 m of the 2,652 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 437 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, an aircraft landing score of 93.3% is a solid performance, showing that the pilot was skilled and proficient in handling the various phases of the landing process.
Starting with the Approach Phase, it is noted that the descent path was below the glideslope limit, indicating the need for better altitude management. Additionally, the speed was slightly above target, which could be addressed by more precise speed control. It is important to ensure that the descent path and speed are in line with established parameters to improve future landings.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, it is commendable that the threshold height was slightly below target and the landing flare was executed perfectly. This indicates good judgment and technique in the crucial moments before touchdown. However, the touchdown rate was marked as hard, suggesting that there may have been room for improvement in terms of smoothness upon contact with the runway. Additionally, maintaining speed within target range during touchdown is essential for a smooth landing experience.
In the Touchdown Phase, it is noted that the touchdown speed was slightly above target and the touchdown distance was inside the touchdown zone. While being inside the designated zone is preferable, the slightly higher speed may have contributed to the hard touchdown rate. Furthermore, the runway touchdown position being 5.8 m from the centreline indicates a slight deviation from the ideal alignment.
Finally, in the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment being 9.3 m from the centreline suggests the need for better alignment control during the rollout process. Maintaining a straight path down the runway is essential for safe and efficient taxiing after landing.
In conclusion, while the landing score of 93.3% reflects a strong performance overall, there are areas for improvement in altitude management, speed control, smoothness of touchdown, alignment, and positioning. With continued practice and focus on these key areas, the pilot can further enhance their landing skills and strive for even higher scores in the future. Keep up the good work and continue to strive for excellence in every landing attempt.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values