Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Make small rudder corrections against a point at the far end to hold the centreline.
What happened: During the ground roll you drifted 4.8 m off the runway centreline.
Watch for: Watch runway alignment against the centreline, correcting with small rudder inputs.
See Departure Roll
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 18 stages, 16 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 3,287 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 220 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took 16 minutes and covered a distance of 3 nautical miles. The aircraft, an Airbus A321, then departed from runway 23L at Düsseldorf Airport (EDDL), with a takeoff distance of 1,297 meters, which accounted for 54% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 156 knots.
As the aircraft took to the skies, it encountered local weather conditions of 23°C temperature and winds of 7 knots at 199 degrees. The crosswind was 4 knots, while the headwind was 6 knots. The enroute climb started overhead Düsseldorf Airport, with the aircraft ascending from 1,210 feet above sea level to 38,891 feet above sea level, an increase of 37,681 feet in 24 minutes, covering a distance of 165 nautical miles.
The enroute level cruise began 1 mile southwest of Moisburg, Germany, and lasted for 20 minutes, covering a distance of 155 nautical miles. The aircraft then started its enroute descent overhead Copenhagen Roskilde Airport (EKRK), descending from 39,025 feet above sea level to 1,768 feet above sea level, a decrease of 37,257 feet in 27 minutes, covering a distance of 130 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 21 at Göteborg Landvetter Airport (ESGG) was made from the northeast, with the aircraft heading 206.0 degrees at 4 nautical miles and 1,267 feet above ground level. The landing on runway 21 was successful, with a touchdown distance of 222 meters, which was good. The touchdown speed was slightly above the target at 136 knots, while the touchdown rate was firm at -354 feet per minute. The runway touchdown alignment was very good.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were 17°C temperature and winds of 9 knots at 190 degrees. The crosswind was 2 knots, while the headwind was 9 knots. The total landing distance was 918 meters, which accounted for 28% of the runway. The runway rollout alignment was perfect. Taxiing to the parking from the runway took 5 minutes and covered less than 1 nautical mile.
The total flight distance was 460 nautical miles, taking 90 minutes, and the aircraft used 3,822 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The Airbus A321 successfully landed at ESGG Göteborg Landvetter Airport, achieving a high score of 98.5%. The aircraft approached the runway from the north east, heading 206.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,267 feet above ground level (agl). The final approach was executed with precision, and the aircraft landed safely on runway 21, which has a length of 3,287 meters.
The threshold height was good, indicating that the aircraft was at the correct altitude as it approached the runway. However, the threshold speed was slightly above the target speed of 135 kt, which is a minor deviation. The touchdown distance of 222 meters was within the acceptable range, demonstrating good control and precision during the landing.
The touchdown speed of 134 kt was a little fast, which may have resulted in a firmer touchdown rate of -354 feet per minute (fpm). Despite this, the runway touchdown alignment was very good, indicating that the aircraft was properly aligned with the runway centerline.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were favorable, with a temperature of 17°C and a wind speed of 9 kt from 190°. The crosswind component was minimal at 2 kt, while the headwind component was 9 kt, which helped to reduce the landing distance.
The total landing distance of 918 meters was 28% of the runway length, which is a relatively short distance. This suggests that the aircraft was well-controlled and landed smoothly. The runway rollout alignment was perfect, indicating that the aircraft maintained its alignment with the runway centerline during the rollout phase.
Overall, the landing was executed with precision and control, and the aircraft landed safely on the runway. The minor deviations in threshold speed and touchdown speed did not significantly impact the overall performance of the landing.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values